The land of We

stdClass Object
(
    [id] => 19636
    [title] => Capitalism, a new Catholic spirit
    [alias] => capitalism-a-new-catholic-spirit
    [introtext] => 

The land of We/8 - The market, the merchants and the Gospel: scientific reflection and social works

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on 11//11/2023

The era of the medieval merchants and of their companies where in the Book of Reason, the main account was listed under the name of "Messer Domineddio", was the time when the alliance between the merchants and the mendicant friars generated Florence, Padua or Bologna. It was an extraordinary era that failed to become the modern Italian and Meridian economic culture because the Lutheran Reformation and the Catholic Counter-Reformation split Europe in two and prevented the medieval civil seeds from fully flourishing. It was, paradoxically, the Protestant Nordic world that gained a part of the legacy of the first medieval market economy (but without its charisms, without Francis and Benedict), although it was born in controversy with the wealth of the Roman Christianity of the Renaissance Popes. Catholic countries, including Italy in a special way, experienced the Protestant Reformation as a religious and civil trauma, and the results were typical of a major collective trauma. We cannot know what Italian and Meridian society and economy could have become if that alliance between Franciscans and merchants had continued after the sixteenth century, if the Catholic Church had not been afraid, at times terrified, in the face of any form of individual freedom, convinced that the "internal forum" without the control of the pastors was too exposed to the winds of heresy coming from the North. All that class of humanist merchants that developed between Dante and Masaccio, Michelangelo and Machiavelli, the businesses and banks of the Tuscans and the Lombards, shattered on the rock of the Council of Trent. With the end of the sixteenth century the Baroque age began which contributed some artistic and literary excellence but did not generate children and grandchildren equal to those first merchants who were friends of the friars and the cities. The Baroque history of Italy is the story of an interrupted path, of an unfinished civil, religious and economic history which had determining effects on the shape of the modern economy and society under the Alps. That set of theology, legal and moral norms, practices and prohibitions, fears and anxieties that we call Counter-Reformation (I do not use the expression of Catholic Reformation, even if there was a Reformation in the Catholic Counter-Reformation and a Counter-Reformation in the Protestant Reformation) has not only conditioned our religious life, it has also changed and shaped our businesses, politics, banks, communities, families and taxes.

[fulltext] =>

In this Italy of the Counter-Reformation, despite everything, some dimensions of the medieval and Renaissance economic ethos nevertheless managed, to survive the restoration. Some ancient spirit slipped into the hidden places between the folds of people's lives, into the living spaces not occupied by religious power. These were often submerged spaces, real karst rivers, where some merchants and bankers managed to wedge themselves without being discouraged and defeated by the manuals for confessors or by the anti-economic and anti-civil catechisms of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. In these centuries, many Monti di Pietà died out but others became commercial banks. We have seen that the Grain Banks survived longer, for four centuries, and were poor but decisive resources for Southern Italy. There were few but there were some scholars of economics, who, navigating between prohibitions and ecclesiastical condemnations, wrote beautiful pages of economic theory. First Antonio Serra and Tommaso Campanella, then Ludovico Muratori and Scipione Maffei were that ideal bridge that united the shores of civil Humanism with the reforming Enlightenment of Genovesi and his Neapolitan civil school (of Dragonetti, Longano, Odazi, Filangieri, Galanti...), which was one of the brightest seasons in Italian history. The economic eighteenth century soon clashed with the restoration of the first decades of the nineteenth century, and then anti-modernism between the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the years of the Non-expedit of Pius IX and the Pascendi dominici gregis of Pius X (1907), which was culturally similar to the climate created by the Counter-Reformation in past centuries.

Coming directly to economics, in the 1820s and 1830s, the Neapolitan Francesco Fuoco wrote texts that were still entirely Genoese, and therefore humanist, pages inherited from the humanist merchant-bankers of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries in Tuscany. But with Fuoco, the Genoese tradition of Civil Economy ended, because with the mid-nineteenth century our best economists re-founded the Italian tradition on French and English bases, without any vital link with the Neapolitan and Italian eighteenth century. We still had good economists but now they were all very distant from the Genoese and inserted into the main flow of a new, international and increasingly Anglo-Saxon-led science. Italy became a periphery, although it was still respected until the Second World War (thanks above all to the widely held enormous esteem for Vilfredo Pareto).

However, between the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, not many Italian economists, even very talented ones, attempted to reconnect with the classic Italian tradition, without following the single bandwagon of science in its new tracks. One of these, and perhaps the most interesting one, is Achille Loria (1857-1943), from Mantua, whom we left last week with his "theory of rent", similar to that of Francesco Fuoco. Loria was among the few economists of his time who did not forget about the Grain Banks: "The Grain Banks, which lent wheat in kind, giving the borrower, at the time of sowing, a waning bushel of wheat and receiving, at the time of harvest, a full bushel of wheat: the difference between the two bushels represented the interest. But over time this loan was mostly made in favour of the large owners and therefore it lost all its philanthropic character, which constituted its merit" (Course in Political Economy, 1927, p.695). Loria's interest in rent, which he placed at the centre of his system, was an expression of a vision of the economy and society centred on profits and therefore on entrepreneurs, on the productive class, therefore critical of the parasitic tendency of Italian culture, which grew exponentially during the Counter-Reformation. The seventeenth century was in fact a time of return to the land, of the nobility of blood, of counts and marquises, of a class of nobles who lived without working and all the rest of society who worked without living: "Then comes another distinction of social classes, shaped by the distinction of capital into productive and unproductive: that of the productive capitalists, exclusively devoted to industry and that of the unproductive who do not increase social wealth but speculate on values, forming their income by extracting from the income of others" (The economic synthesis, 1910, p. 211).

However, one question remains. Loria was a follower of the Italian civil tradition, but he was not Catholic (he was from a Jewish family): where then was Catholic economic thought in the twentieth century directed? Loria also wrote about cooperation and the cooperative movement. It was in the writings on cooperation, on rural savings banks, and then on savings banks that we find some of the most beautiful pages of Civil Economy by Italian writers, starting from the second half of the nineteenth century, including some beautiful ones by Giuseppe Mazzini. Just as in the time of the Counter-Reformation, Italian Catholics dedicated themselves to the establishment of the Monti di Pietà, the Grain Banks and to an enormous quantity (and quality) of social works, schools, hospitals, also the night of free thinking between the nineteenth and twentieth centuries anti-modernists saw a great proliferation of social works, institutions, cooperatives, banks and non-academic writers who were skilled builders of the common good.

However, this does not mean that the anti-modernist wave of the Catholic Church did not also heavily involve the few Catholic economists of the first half of the twentieth century, from Giuseppe Toniolo up to Amintore Fanfani. This Catholic tradition, which had an important centre in the early days of the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Milan founded by Agostino Gemelli, continued to view the Middle Ages as the golden age and the Scholasticism of Thomas as the highest point of Christian culture and philosophy, also in the economic field. For Fanfani, an author with his own brilliance and originality, the ethical pinnacle of economic ethics was reached between the thirteenth and the early fourteenth centuries, when, with the first hints of Humanism – interpreted as a resurgence of paganism – the decline of Christian civilization began. This gave rise, as early as the end of the fourteenth century, to the spirit of capitalism, which for Fanfani was an evil spirit. Fanfani, criticizing (perhaps without understanding) Max Weber, affirmed that capitalism did not originate in the Protestant world but in Italy between the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, when economic practices abandoned the teachings of Scholasticism and began to follow different paths far from authentic evangelical humanism: "Throughout the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries the number of those who adopted illicit methods in the acquisition of wealth, according to Thomistic rules, increased ... The neighbour lost the physiognomy of brother and acquired that of competitor, that is, of enemy" (The origins of the capitalist spirit in Italy, Vita e Pensiero, 1933, p.162). Thus, merchants such as Marco Francesco Datini redeemed themselves from a misguided life "trying to make amends at the point of death" (p.165). Because, by then, "wealth is a means solely for satisfying one's needs" (p.165). Instead, until the mid-fourteenth century, for Fanfani the economy was Christian because "economic activity, like all other human activities, had to revolve around God... Everyone met in one idea: that of Theo-centricity" (p.158). The fifteenth century was therefore the birth of the spirit of the capitalist who "knows no other limit of conduct than that of utility" (p.155).

Thus, all the work of the Franciscan school between the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries (which Fanfani and Toniolo ignored or did not take seriously), which had led to a new conception of civil profit and the merchant as a friend of the city, was considered degeneration and decadence by the true Christian spirit, the one which was dominated by Thomism, where people worked only for the common good, because, it was believed that working for private gain is only a form of selfishness and the pursuit of personal utility. So his vision that pits Humanism against Scholasticism, and above all considers the centrality of God in competition with the centrality of man, as if God wanted a world entirely directed to himself, a Father who would not enjoy the autonomy of his children by wanting them all for his exclusive service – what non-incestuous father would ever do that? Thus it was forgotten that the fourteenth, fifteenth and sixteenth centuries were the centuries when the alliance between Franciscans and merchants had worked authentic economic, civil, artistic and spiritual miracles and the enmity between the centrality of God and the centrality of men that had dominated the Counter-Reformation returned in the twentieth century.

Many documents of the Social Doctrine of the Church reflect these anti-modern, anti-market, anti-entrepreneur and anti-bank decades (it is not surprising that neither the word entrepreneur nor bank is present in our Constitution). This is why today it would be not only urgent but very necessary for the studies of Social Doctrine to truly start again from Humanism, from that period when the market was born from the Christian spirit, from merchants and beggars together, from the Gospel, not against it. This is what we have tried to do in these last few weeks. Thank you to those who have followed us on this challenging but perhaps somewhat useful journey.

[checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [catid] => 1168 [created] => 2023-11-12 08:21:58 [created_by] => 64 [created_by_alias] => Luigino Bruni [state] => 1 [modified] => 2023-11-29 10:30:41 [modified_by] => 64 [modified_by_name] => Antonella Ferrucci [publish_up] => 2023-11-12 08:21:28 [publish_down] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [images] => {"image_intro":"","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {"urla":false,"urlatext":"","targeta":"","urlb":false,"urlbtext":"","targetb":"","urlc":false,"urlctext":"","targetc":""} [attribs] => {"article_layout":"","show_title":"","link_titles":"","show_tags":"","show_intro":"","info_block_position":"","info_block_show_title":"","show_category":"","link_category":"","show_parent_category":"","link_parent_category":"","show_associations":"","show_author":"","link_author":"","show_create_date":"","show_modify_date":"","show_publish_date":"","show_item_navigation":"","show_icons":"","show_print_icon":"","show_email_icon":"","show_vote":"","show_hits":"","show_noauth":"","urls_position":"","alternative_readmore":"","article_page_title":"","show_publishing_options":"","show_article_options":"","show_urls_images_backend":"","show_urls_images_frontend":"","helix_ultimate_image":"images\/2023\/11\/11\/231111_La_terra_del_noi_08_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_image_alt_txt":"","spfeatured_image":"images\/2023\/11\/11\/231111_La_terra_del_noi_08_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_article_format":"standard","helix_ultimate_audio":"","helix_ultimate_gallery":"","helix_ultimate_video":"","video":""} [metadata] => {"robots":"","author":"","rights":"","xreference":""} [metakey] => [metadesc] => [access] => 1 [hits] => 341 [xreference] => [featured] => 1 [language] => en-GB [on_img_default] => 0 [readmore] => 9734 [ordering] => 0 [category_title] => EN - The land of We [category_route] => oikonomia/it-la-terra-del-noi [category_access] => 1 [category_alias] => en-the-land-of-we [published] => 1 [parents_published] => 1 [lft] => 106 [author] => Luigino Bruni [author_email] => ferrucci.anto@gmail.com [parent_title] => Oikonomia [parent_id] => 1025 [parent_route] => oikonomia [parent_alias] => oikonomia [rating] => 0 [rating_count] => 0 [alternative_readmore] => [layout] => [params] => Joomla\Registry\Registry Object ( [data:protected] => stdClass Object ( [article_layout] => _:default [show_title] => 1 [link_titles] => 1 [show_intro] => 1 [info_block_position] => 0 [info_block_show_title] => 1 [show_category] => 1 [link_category] => 1 [show_parent_category] => 1 [link_parent_category] => 1 [show_associations] => 0 [flags] => 1 [show_author] => 0 [link_author] => 0 [show_create_date] => 1 [show_modify_date] => 0 [show_publish_date] => 1 [show_item_navigation] => 1 [show_vote] => 0 [show_readmore] => 0 [show_readmore_title] => 0 [readmore_limit] => 100 [show_tags] => 1 [show_icons] => 1 [show_print_icon] => 1 [show_email_icon] => 1 [show_hits] => 0 [record_hits] => 1 [show_noauth] => 0 [urls_position] => 1 [captcha] => [show_publishing_options] => 1 [show_article_options] => 1 [save_history] => 1 [history_limit] => 10 [show_urls_images_frontend] => 0 [show_urls_images_backend] => 1 [targeta] => 0 [targetb] => 0 [targetc] => 0 [float_intro] => left [float_fulltext] => left [category_layout] => _:blog [show_category_heading_title_text] => 0 [show_category_title] => 0 [show_description] => 0 [show_description_image] => 0 [maxLevel] => 0 [show_empty_categories] => 0 [show_no_articles] => 0 [show_subcat_desc] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles] => 0 [show_cat_tags] => 1 [show_base_description] => 1 [maxLevelcat] => -1 [show_empty_categories_cat] => 0 [show_subcat_desc_cat] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles_cat] => 0 [num_leading_articles] => 0 [num_intro_articles] => 14 [num_columns] => 2 [num_links] => 0 [multi_column_order] => 1 [show_subcategory_content] => -1 [show_pagination_limit] => 1 [filter_field] => hide [show_headings] => 1 [list_show_date] => 0 [date_format] => [list_show_hits] => 1 [list_show_author] => 1 [list_show_votes] => 0 [list_show_ratings] => 0 [orderby_pri] => none [orderby_sec] => rdate [order_date] => published [show_pagination] => 2 [show_pagination_results] => 1 [show_featured] => show [show_feed_link] => 1 [feed_summary] => 0 [feed_show_readmore] => 0 [sef_advanced] => 1 [sef_ids] => 1 [custom_fields_enable] => 1 [show_page_heading] => 0 [layout_type] => blog [menu_text] => 1 [menu_show] => 1 [secure] => 0 [helixultimatemenulayout] => {"width":600,"menualign":"right","megamenu":0,"showtitle":1,"faicon":"","customclass":"","dropdown":"right","badge":"","badge_position":"","badge_bg_color":"","badge_text_color":"","layout":[]} [helixultimate_enable_page_title] => 1 [helixultimate_page_title_alt] => Oikonomia [helixultimate_page_subtitle] => La terra del noi [helixultimate_page_title_heading] => h2 [page_title] => The land of We [page_description] => [page_rights] => [robots] => [access-view] => 1 ) [initialized:protected] => 1 [separator] => . ) [displayDate] => 2023-11-12 08:21:58 [tags] => Joomla\CMS\Helper\TagsHelper Object ( [tagsChanged:protected] => [replaceTags:protected] => [typeAlias] => [itemTags] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [tag_id] => 191 [id] => 191 [parent_id] => 1 [lft] => 379 [rgt] => 380 [level] => 1 [path] => la-terra-del-noi [title] => La terra del 'noi' [alias] => la-terra-del-noi [note] => [description] => [published] => 1 [checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [access] => 1 [params] => {} [metadesc] => [metakey] => [metadata] => {} [created_user_id] => 64 [created_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [created_by_alias] => [modified_user_id] => 0 [modified_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [images] => {} [urls] => {} [hits] => 1594 [language] => * [version] => 1 [publish_up] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [publish_down] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 ) ) ) [slug] => 19636:capitalism-a-new-catholic-spirit [parent_slug] => 1025:oikonomia [catslug] => 1168:en-the-land-of-we [event] => stdClass Object ( [afterDisplayTitle] => [beforeDisplayContent] => [afterDisplayContent] => ) [text] =>

The land of We/8 - The market, the merchants and the Gospel: scientific reflection and social works

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on 11//11/2023

The era of the medieval merchants and of their companies where in the Book of Reason, the main account was listed under the name of "Messer Domineddio", was the time when the alliance between the merchants and the mendicant friars generated Florence, Padua or Bologna. It was an extraordinary era that failed to become the modern Italian and Meridian economic culture because the Lutheran Reformation and the Catholic Counter-Reformation split Europe in two and prevented the medieval civil seeds from fully flourishing. It was, paradoxically, the Protestant Nordic world that gained a part of the legacy of the first medieval market economy (but without its charisms, without Francis and Benedict), although it was born in controversy with the wealth of the Roman Christianity of the Renaissance Popes. Catholic countries, including Italy in a special way, experienced the Protestant Reformation as a religious and civil trauma, and the results were typical of a major collective trauma. We cannot know what Italian and Meridian society and economy could have become if that alliance between Franciscans and merchants had continued after the sixteenth century, if the Catholic Church had not been afraid, at times terrified, in the face of any form of individual freedom, convinced that the "internal forum" without the control of the pastors was too exposed to the winds of heresy coming from the North. All that class of humanist merchants that developed between Dante and Masaccio, Michelangelo and Machiavelli, the businesses and banks of the Tuscans and the Lombards, shattered on the rock of the Council of Trent. With the end of the sixteenth century the Baroque age began which contributed some artistic and literary excellence but did not generate children and grandchildren equal to those first merchants who were friends of the friars and the cities. The Baroque history of Italy is the story of an interrupted path, of an unfinished civil, religious and economic history which had determining effects on the shape of the modern economy and society under the Alps. That set of theology, legal and moral norms, practices and prohibitions, fears and anxieties that we call Counter-Reformation (I do not use the expression of Catholic Reformation, even if there was a Reformation in the Catholic Counter-Reformation and a Counter-Reformation in the Protestant Reformation) has not only conditioned our religious life, it has also changed and shaped our businesses, politics, banks, communities, families and taxes.

[jcfields] => Array ( ) [type] => intro [oddeven] => item-odd )
Capitalism, a new Catholic spirit

Capitalism, a new Catholic spirit

The land of We/8 - The market, the merchants and the Gospel: scientific reflection and social works by Luigino Bruni published in Avvenire on 11//11/2023 The era of the medieval merchants and of their companies where in the Book of Reason, the main account was listed under the name of "Messer Dom...
stdClass Object
(
    [id] => 19620
    [title] => Real economics starts from human suffering
    [alias] => real-economics-starts-from-human-suffering
    [introtext] => 

The land of We/7 - following Fuoco, Achille Loria criticized rent as an element of injustice

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on 04//11/2023

The Counter-Reformation was an ambivalent season, in which the shining examples of the Franciscan Monti were intertwined with dark phenomena in other lands. For Italian economic science, however, it was a good time. While theology and philosophy become risky places due to the widespread control of the Holy Office, the arts, music, sciences and even economics remained safer places where thinkers could express themselves with greater freedom. And so, an age poor in great theologians and philosophers (especially when compared to Northern Europe) generated many excellent writers, musicians, artists, and economists.

[fulltext] =>

The Mediterranean and Catholic economic genius was most expressed in the Kingdom of Naples. The Neapolitan economic tradition began between the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, thanks to Antonio Serra from Cosenza, who wrote a brief treatise (in 1613) considered by many to be the first study of modern economics, not only in Italy. Then came the great season of the Neapolitan eighteenth century, that of Ferdinando Galiani, Antonio Genovesi, Filangieri, Dragonetti and dozens of other excellent economists who wrote about money, credit, and above all "Public happiness". A tradition that remained alive and stimulating until the first half of the nineteenth century with Francesco Fuoco, who can be considered the last of the Italian classical authors.

The birth of the Kingdom of Italy generated a strong tendency to consider only the English and French versions as the "true" economic science and therefore the Neapolitan tradition ended up being judged obsolete and retrograde. Meanwhile, Anglo-Saxon economic science was changing track; it soon departed from the great themes of development and the well-being of peoples and focused on the individual and his usefulness. In this cultural context, the Neapolitan paradigm of Public Happiness, interested more with society than with individuals, appeared even more distant and alien and was soon forgotten.

Francesco Fuoco, "a bizarre and acute spirit" (T. Fornari, Economic Theories of the Neapolitan Provinces, p. 615), was not only an excellent writer on credit and banking. He wrote remarkable pages in many other areas of economic science. In the wake of Genovesi, Fuoco considered the market as a providential form of "mutual aid" and reciprocity. Therefore, the ‘division of labour’ does not divide but unites societies: "The division of labour is not opposed to reunion, on the contrary it presupposes it and serves to make it stronger and more durable" (Scritti Economici, 1825, I, p. 205). In particular, the various professions are a great language of cooperation and mutuality, the first cement of societies: "The division of labour is only the distinction of professions. The more industry is perfected, the more the subdivisions multiply and the more numerous the professions become" (p. 207).

Therefore, industry and the economy are seen by Fuoco as a dense cooperative network where, by working, each person satisfies the needs of others, in reciprocity. Work is a civil language of cooperation, thanks to which thousands, today millions of people, assist and cooperate without even knowing each other. And at this time in which we live when the business narrative is entirely centred on competition, on beating competitors, on antagonistic and warrior virtues, Fuoco and the Neapolitan school tell us an opposite story: the market is civilization because it favours cooperative and kind virtues, because it is based on the golden law of positive reciprocity: "In this way, peoples have become members of a vast family, and a kind of community has been established among all the inhabitants of the earth" (p. x).

But it is on the ‘theory of rent’ that Fuoco concentrated his theoretical energies. During his time in France, he became acquainted with the recent English debate on the rent of land. In particular, he studied the theory of David Ricardo who, in his Principles of Political Economy (1817), proposed a theory of the destruction of income and capitalism different from that of A. Smith, focusing on rent as the key to understanding the dynamics of capitalism. A few years later, Fuoco wrote an essay on rent (in 1825), where he presented the debate, amending and completing it. What was the focus of Fuoco's discourse?

The theory of rent rests on two pillars: (i) the centrality of entrepreneurs (or capitalists) to the wealth and development of nations; (ii) the structural conflict between entrepreneurs and landowners (or rentiers). There are three social classes and three respective incomes: the wage goes to the workers, the profit to the entrepreneurs and the rent to the landowners. Since wages are fixed at subsistence level, the two variables of the economic system are profits and rents, which are in a rival relationship with each other: if one increases, the other decreases. Hence the fundamental idea: economic development meets its limit in the radical conflict between income earners and entrepreneurs, a conflict won by income earners because the dynamics of capitalism lead to a large increase in rents to the detriment of profits. And since entrepreneurs are the engine of development, the reduction in profit leads to the system coming to a standstill: "As rents grow, profits decrease and as profits decrease, saving and therefore accumulation becomes more difficult" (Economic Writings, I, p. 57).

Fuoco was convinced that Public Happiness depended on the growth of industry and therefore of entrepreneurs and consequently on the decrease in the power of rentiers; also because, unlike Ricardo and Malthus, Fuoco was convinced that the growth of rents would push wages downwards and impoverish workers and "consumers" (a word present in his system). Hence his radical proposal on tax matters: "If the government's revenue [taxation] were derived only from land rent, industry would not suffer any damage" (p. 67). This is a thesis that is still prophetic if we think about the low taxation of assets and income of all kinds. Fuoco goes even further, venturing into the realm of social utopia: "If the lands did not belong to anyone, the total income from them could be used for State expenses” (p. 67). A thesis that prefigures the theory of the ‘free land’ of the Mantuan Achille Loria (1857-1943), another great Italian economist, who has been forgotten.

It is in fact Loria himself who praised his Neapolitan predecessor: “Francesco Fuoco, acute illustrator of the Ricardian theory of rent and remarkable for the pre-eminence he assigned to the relations of distribution over those of production" (A. Loria, Towards social justice, 1904, p. 90). In fact, for Fuoco production was very important but he was convinced, and we with him, that if the mechanism that allocates income shares to the various social classes (i.e. "distribution") is distorted and perverse, production will stall.

In the search for the "meridian spirit" of capitalism, Loria is an extremely important author in our history. While the wagon of economic science shifted to consumer preferences and turned into mathematics applied to individual choices, Loria, with infinite tenacity, put the "old" rent at the heart of his theory. He did so throughout his life, as if it was his vocation, from his first university studies in Siena until his death which overtook him in his home in Luserna San Giovanni (To) while the fascists were trying to capture him because he was Jewish. In fact, in his degree thesis he wrote: "Ground rent is not only the most important phenomenon of the entire social organism, but is itself its synthesis" (Land rent, 1880, p. xiii). Loria was a critic of capitalism similar to and different from Karl Marx. Like Marx, he also wanted to understand the great movements of society starting from economic relations; but while for Marx the axis of capitalism was in the conflict between wages and profits, for Loria (and Fuoco) the decisive conflict was between rents and profits: "The real basic split of the two classes of wealth is that which exists between the class of landowners and the class of capitalists as they have antithetical and opposing interests and are therefore in perennial conflict " (La sintesi económica, 1910, p. 211).

Between the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, Loria wrote monumental works to give even greater foundation to his thesis and thus present a theory of historical materialism alternative to that of Marx and F. Engels with whom he had fierce public controversies, partly reported in his Preface to the third volume of Marx's Capital. Loria's story is the story of a defeat. His theory of rent remained crushed "on the left" by the growth of Marxism (A. Gramsci sarcastically coined the expression "Lorianism") and "on the right" by the new liberal neoclassical economy represented in Italy by Pantaleoni and above all by Pareto (who, with his known arrogance, considered Loria a charlatan). Loria, increasingly alone and marginalized (respected by only a few, including Luigi Einaudi), continued to believe in his theory of rent, which over time no longer concerned only land rent but extended to every form of income that exists today thanks to the privileges of yesterday (this is, in essence, rent). This is why he also wrote about financial and banking income - today would he have also dealt with consultancy income to the detriment of entrepreneurs? The theory of rent was therefore the instrument with which Loria criticized a capitalism that was becoming increasingly speculative and distant from work: "The truth is that behind the healthy and normal economic world that the classical school is pleased to paint, behind the farms and estates, the workshops and factories, in dark basements a mob of counterfeit money moves and trades, manipulating and trafficking the wealth of others and extracting very large profits through fraud" (Course in Political Economy, 1910, p. 303).

We can thus understand one of his most beautiful statements: "Anyone who observes human society with a dispassionate soul can easily perceive how it presents the strange phenomenon of an absolute, irrevocable split into two strictly distinct classes; one of which, without doing anything, appropriates enormous and growing incomes, while the other, more numerous by far, works from the morning to the evening of his life in exchange for a Meagher wage; in other words, one lives without working while the other works without living, or without having a dignified life" (The economic bases of the social constitution, 1902, p. 1). The classical system of Ricardo, Fuoco and Loria was three-dimensional: land, labour, capital. The neo-classical economic science of the late nineteenth century instead became two-dimensional: labour and capital. This transformation did not only generate the loss of the theoretical depth that the third dimension of the earth brought with it. The eclipse of the earth in capitalism is one of the main causes of the destruction of the planet and the loss of roots. In an interview (with "The modern office") that he gave on the occasion of his retirement from teaching at the University of Turin, to the question "What is the strongest stimulates for your scientific interest?” Loria replied with a phrase that we should write in all the Economic Departments of the world: " Human suffering".

[checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [catid] => 1168 [created] => 2023-11-05 18:50:48 [created_by] => 64 [created_by_alias] => Luigino Bruni [state] => 1 [modified] => 2023-11-14 17:54:00 [modified_by] => 64 [modified_by_name] => Antonella Ferrucci [publish_up] => 2023-11-05 18:53:23 [publish_down] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [images] => {"image_intro":"","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {"urla":false,"urlatext":"","targeta":"","urlb":false,"urlbtext":"","targetb":"","urlc":false,"urlctext":"","targetc":""} [attribs] => {"article_layout":"","show_title":"","link_titles":"","show_tags":"","show_intro":"","info_block_position":"","info_block_show_title":"","show_category":"","link_category":"","show_parent_category":"","link_parent_category":"","show_associations":"","show_author":"","link_author":"","show_create_date":"","show_modify_date":"","show_publish_date":"","show_item_navigation":"","show_icons":"","show_print_icon":"","show_email_icon":"","show_vote":"","show_hits":"","show_noauth":"","urls_position":"","alternative_readmore":"","article_page_title":"","show_publishing_options":"","show_article_options":"","show_urls_images_backend":"","show_urls_images_frontend":"","helix_ultimate_image":"images\/2023\/11\/05\/231104_La_terra_del_noi_07_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_image_alt_txt":"","spfeatured_image":"images\/2023\/11\/05\/231104_La_terra_del_noi_07_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_article_format":"standard","helix_ultimate_audio":"","helix_ultimate_gallery":"","helix_ultimate_video":"","video":""} [metadata] => {"robots":"","author":"","rights":"","xreference":""} [metakey] => [metadesc] => [access] => 1 [hits] => 382 [xreference] => [featured] => 1 [language] => en-GB [on_img_default] => 0 [readmore] => 11035 [ordering] => 0 [category_title] => EN - The land of We [category_route] => oikonomia/it-la-terra-del-noi [category_access] => 1 [category_alias] => en-the-land-of-we [published] => 1 [parents_published] => 1 [lft] => 106 [author] => Luigino Bruni [author_email] => ferrucci.anto@gmail.com [parent_title] => Oikonomia [parent_id] => 1025 [parent_route] => oikonomia [parent_alias] => oikonomia [rating] => 0 [rating_count] => 0 [alternative_readmore] => [layout] => [params] => Joomla\Registry\Registry Object ( [data:protected] => stdClass Object ( [article_layout] => _:default [show_title] => 1 [link_titles] => 1 [show_intro] => 1 [info_block_position] => 0 [info_block_show_title] => 1 [show_category] => 1 [link_category] => 1 [show_parent_category] => 1 [link_parent_category] => 1 [show_associations] => 0 [flags] => 1 [show_author] => 0 [link_author] => 0 [show_create_date] => 1 [show_modify_date] => 0 [show_publish_date] => 1 [show_item_navigation] => 1 [show_vote] => 0 [show_readmore] => 0 [show_readmore_title] => 0 [readmore_limit] => 100 [show_tags] => 1 [show_icons] => 1 [show_print_icon] => 1 [show_email_icon] => 1 [show_hits] => 0 [record_hits] => 1 [show_noauth] => 0 [urls_position] => 1 [captcha] => [show_publishing_options] => 1 [show_article_options] => 1 [save_history] => 1 [history_limit] => 10 [show_urls_images_frontend] => 0 [show_urls_images_backend] => 1 [targeta] => 0 [targetb] => 0 [targetc] => 0 [float_intro] => left [float_fulltext] => left [category_layout] => _:blog [show_category_heading_title_text] => 0 [show_category_title] => 0 [show_description] => 0 [show_description_image] => 0 [maxLevel] => 0 [show_empty_categories] => 0 [show_no_articles] => 0 [show_subcat_desc] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles] => 0 [show_cat_tags] => 1 [show_base_description] => 1 [maxLevelcat] => -1 [show_empty_categories_cat] => 0 [show_subcat_desc_cat] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles_cat] => 0 [num_leading_articles] => 0 [num_intro_articles] => 14 [num_columns] => 2 [num_links] => 0 [multi_column_order] => 1 [show_subcategory_content] => -1 [show_pagination_limit] => 1 [filter_field] => hide [show_headings] => 1 [list_show_date] => 0 [date_format] => [list_show_hits] => 1 [list_show_author] => 1 [list_show_votes] => 0 [list_show_ratings] => 0 [orderby_pri] => none [orderby_sec] => rdate [order_date] => published [show_pagination] => 2 [show_pagination_results] => 1 [show_featured] => show [show_feed_link] => 1 [feed_summary] => 0 [feed_show_readmore] => 0 [sef_advanced] => 1 [sef_ids] => 1 [custom_fields_enable] => 1 [show_page_heading] => 0 [layout_type] => blog [menu_text] => 1 [menu_show] => 1 [secure] => 0 [helixultimatemenulayout] => {"width":600,"menualign":"right","megamenu":0,"showtitle":1,"faicon":"","customclass":"","dropdown":"right","badge":"","badge_position":"","badge_bg_color":"","badge_text_color":"","layout":[]} [helixultimate_enable_page_title] => 1 [helixultimate_page_title_alt] => Oikonomia [helixultimate_page_subtitle] => La terra del noi [helixultimate_page_title_heading] => h2 [page_title] => The land of We [page_description] => [page_rights] => [robots] => [access-view] => 1 ) [initialized:protected] => 1 [separator] => . ) [displayDate] => 2023-11-05 18:50:48 [tags] => Joomla\CMS\Helper\TagsHelper Object ( [tagsChanged:protected] => [replaceTags:protected] => [typeAlias] => [itemTags] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [tag_id] => 191 [id] => 191 [parent_id] => 1 [lft] => 379 [rgt] => 380 [level] => 1 [path] => la-terra-del-noi [title] => La terra del 'noi' [alias] => la-terra-del-noi [note] => [description] => [published] => 1 [checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [access] => 1 [params] => {} [metadesc] => [metakey] => [metadata] => {} [created_user_id] => 64 [created_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [created_by_alias] => [modified_user_id] => 0 [modified_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [images] => {} [urls] => {} [hits] => 1594 [language] => * [version] => 1 [publish_up] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [publish_down] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 ) ) ) [slug] => 19620:real-economics-starts-from-human-suffering [parent_slug] => 1025:oikonomia [catslug] => 1168:en-the-land-of-we [event] => stdClass Object ( [afterDisplayTitle] => [beforeDisplayContent] => [afterDisplayContent] => ) [text] =>

The land of We/7 - following Fuoco, Achille Loria criticized rent as an element of injustice

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on 04//11/2023

The Counter-Reformation was an ambivalent season, in which the shining examples of the Franciscan Monti were intertwined with dark phenomena in other lands. For Italian economic science, however, it was a good time. While theology and philosophy become risky places due to the widespread control of the Holy Office, the arts, music, sciences and even economics remained safer places where thinkers could express themselves with greater freedom. And so, an age poor in great theologians and philosophers (especially when compared to Northern Europe) generated many excellent writers, musicians, artists, and economists.

[jcfields] => Array ( ) [type] => intro [oddeven] => item-even )
Real economics starts from human suffering

Real economics starts from human suffering

The land of We/7 - following Fuoco, Achille Loria criticized rent as an element of injustice by Luigino Bruni published in Avvenire on 04//11/2023 The Counter-Reformation was an ambivalent season, in which the shining examples of the Franciscan Monti were intertwined with dark phenomena in other ...
stdClass Object
(
    [id] => 19617
    [title] => The prophecy of a market based on trust alone
    [alias] => the-prophecy-of-a-market-based-on-trust-alone
    [introtext] => 

The land of We/6 - The Neapolitan Civil Economy of the eighteenth century and Francesco Fuoco

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on 28/10/2023

The idea that exchange is a ‘game’ where the gains of one party are equal and opposite to the losses of the other, is often the first difficulty that a teacher encounters in the first lessons of economics. Students approach economic science with the belief that the market is a place of ‘zero-sum’ (+1/-1) relationships. It is difficult to convey the idea that in economic exchange the golden law is mutual advantage and therefore the gains of one party also correspond to gains for the other and when this mutual advantage does not occur, the market is distorted and denied and ends up resembling war, robbery or athletics (the sports metaphor for the economy is almost always wrong). Behind the bad reputation that economic operators have enjoyed for centuries, was the same mistake that my students make today. If the market is really a relationship where one party enriches itself at the expense of the other, it becomes necessary to protect the weak party, restrict the area of exchanges and then view merchants and bankers with great ethical distrust. Religious prohibitions on interest-bearing loans only reinforced a negativity that already existed. Merchants and economic and financial operators were well aware that the market was a ‘positive sum game’; they knew this because it was based on contracts, which when carried out in freedom reveal the mutually beneficial nature of the parties - why should I give my free consent to a predatory relationship? In the same way, they knew that the mutual advantage was often asymmetrical (+4, +1) due to different information and power balances. However, when the contract generated a minus somewhere (+2,-1), they knew that they were exiting the economy and entering into theft, leaving behind physiology and entering into the pathology of the market.

[fulltext] =>

The real problem lay elsewhere, that is, above all among theologians and philosophers. Those who wrote about prices, markets or interests were for the most part intellectuals who (with the happy exception of the Franciscans and some Dominicans) preached about trade and business without having, in general, the faintest idea of what real markets, real loans, real contracts, real shops and entrepreneurs were (a problem that, in part, still exists). And so the idea was superior to reality and the moral treatises and manuals for confessors described a commercial world that was distorted and distant from the real lives of people. So much so that while treaties against trade and usury multiplied, the Middle Ages was filled with tens of thousands of Christian bankers and merchants, who made profits, took and lent with usury and made our cities beautiful.

Describing the great spread of usury in Italy in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, A.L. Muratori recalls that loans with interest were provided for in the statutes of the cities, where often there was even a public register of usurers. Muratori cited a document from 1339 which said, "No person in Siena could lend with usury in anyway, if he does not first register in the book entitled Usuraio of Bischerna" (Opera Omnia, 1790[1738-1743], XVI, p. 310). The ‘Bischerna’ was the ancient legal system. He continued: "Whoever lent with usury, gave the loan for only six months and whoever received the money, contributed with a gift to the usurer; that is, he paid the fruit of the six months immediately". After the six months, "if the debtor did not pay, the interest that the debtor was then obliged to pay was a quarter of a penny for each lira for each single month" (p. 311), that is, 4% per month which was equal to almost 50% per year (and this explains why the 5% per year on loans from the Monte di Pietà was really a non-profit institution rate). The language is striking: there was talk of a gift to the usurer, because presenting the interest as a gift made it easier to circumvent ecclesiastical prohibitions against usury. However, every merchant knew that the reality was very different from the words with which it was expressed and that the idea of gift had nothing to do with it. Eloquent expressions are the first casualties when reality drifts away from the concept of reality. Thus, until recently, hypocrisy and double standards flourished as the fertile ground for merchants and bankers from the Middle Ages.

After centuries, theologians of the Counter-Reformation perpetuated a civil hypocrisy by reinstating ancient and abstract prohibitions on profits and usury, which had been largely overcome by the Franciscans and merchants between the thirteenth and sixteenth centuries. In the seventeenth century, a widening gap and mutual distrust developed between the economic and ecclesiastical worlds, including the very Christian bankers of the Popes. Religion became a matter for worship and feasts, for fraternities and processions, for births and deaths, for wives and women, but merchants and bankers kept well away from the confessionals and sermons. Among the many counter-reformist preachers and theologians, the Jesuit Paolo Segneri (1624-1694) stands out. He was a respected literary figure (he collaborated on the third edition of the Vocabolario della Crusca) and the author of many manuals for confessors and treatises on morals. The most famous of these is The Christian instructed according to his law, from 1686, in which he criticized merchants harshly saying, "by selling things in credit to the poor, they then give them this privilege, that since they have no money they pay more for it". So credit-credit is a scam created by the seller for the sole purpose of increasing his earnings at the expense of the poor. And he adds: "I know that merchants defend themselves with those very precious titles of ‘loss of profit’ and ‘emerging damage’..., but I really think that they often use them as a simple hook to forcibly gather the fruits that they are unable to reach by hand" (Ed. Veneziana, Carlo Todero, 1765, vol. 1, p. 207). These elegant phrases really reveal a low moral picture of the market, carried out in dark shops: "The buyer seeks illegal advantages, either in the unfair price he offers or in the weakness of the currency. The seller tries to hide the defects of the merchandise he displays and when questioned does not reveal them otherwise, artfully choosing dark shops so they are less visible" (p. 209). Then he continues with his doubts (which are really certainties): "I think, that often this great danger they have learned, of not being paid by selling in time will occur because they often want the Mallevadore [guarantor]; and as if the Mallevadore is not enough, they want a pledge" (p. 207). It is clear that here Segneri speaks of merchants but also of bankers, who in the ancient regime were often the same people. And he concludes: "It is very difficult to negotiate a lot and not harm others’ shops" (p. 208). Finally, the idea of exchange as a ‘zero-sum game’ emerges very clearly: "In every contract between purchase and sale, sin stands in the way, like a stake stuck between the walls... Almost as if the injustice between those two terms is so limited that even if you want to, you cannot go free. On one side it is held strong by the buyer and on the other it is held strong by the seller" (p. 208).

It should therefore not surprise us, given this dominant idea regarding trade and credit, that neither the word entrepreneur nor bank appears in our beautiful Italian Constitution.

The Neapolitan and Italian civil economy was born in the eighteenth century with a different idea of market and credit. We have already seen it with Genovesi, and now we see it with one of his heirs, the Casertan (Mignano) Francesco Fuoco (1774-1841). Fuoco, now forgotten in his own homeland, was an extremely original, at times brilliant, author. Priest, Neapolitan revolutionary of 1799, teacher, mathematician, physicist, Latin geographer and philologist in the first phase of his activity, he then became an economist following his French political confinement (1821-23), where he studied with the great economist J.B. Say. In this French phase he began his complicated collaboration with the Como businessman Giuseppe de Welz, for whom he wrote, perhaps out of economic necessity, his first works on economics and finance (which were published by de Welz: an attribution dispute that has not yet been fully resolved). They include the book The Magic of Credit Unveiled (1824), where we find an innovative and sometimes surprising theory of credit and banking. His point of reference is Antonio Genovesi, of whom he cites extensive passages in his Economic Essays (1825-27), where, among other things, speaking of maxima and minima in economics (Fuoco is one of the first mathematical economists), he writes: "The notion of minimum wage is the point at which the worker refuses to work due to insufficient wages" (Vol. II, p. 11), to remind us that the minimum wage is anything but a recent or bizarre issue.

In the introduction to The Magic of Credit, Fuoco begins by saying that he came across a thesis by a French author so bizarre as to seem at first delirious: "Whoever has the talent to contract debts possesses the art of becoming rich" (p. 1). The possible delirium arose from the memory, of which, as a fine writer, Fuoco was very well aware, of satirical texts such as Il debitor felice, by Ser Muzio Petroni da Trevi who at the end of the 1500s affirmed that "you cannot give yourself greater happiness in this life than having debts", and praised those who lived without working, making others work for themselves. Clearly the praise of credit (not so much of debt) that Fuoco shares had very different and opposite roots.

A few years later, in his Economic Essays he wrote pages of great beauty and relevance on credit: "The means that give maximum energy to the work of a people are created and multiplied by virtue of credit and credit is strengthened to the extent that work is perfected" (II, p. 395). He therefore speaks of an “alliance between work and credit", based on mutual advantage, essential for public happiness. An alliance he calls ‘intimate’, thanks to which "morality spreads".

As for the interest on the loan, for Fuoco "nothing is fairer than receiving compensation from the loan" (p. 397). Quoting Genovesi at length, "to whom we could add nothing better", he concludes by saying that "capital is a sterile wealth when it is not used for productive purposes, that is, for any branch of industry. Therefore, lending is a necessary condition to turn capital to productive uses” (II, p. 415).

The conclusion of his reasoning is very beautiful: "The creation and use of capital rests on credit and therefore on morality which was and will always be its foundation. If the principles of morality were generally recognized and respected, credit alone would be enough to give life to the general economy of peoples" (II, p. 416). An economy therefore of credit alone, an economy of pure credit, a market of faith alone. Today it seems like a utopia of yesterday: what if it were instead a prophecy of tomorrow?

[checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [catid] => 1168 [created] => 2023-10-28 09:01:10 [created_by] => 64 [created_by_alias] => Luigino Bruni [state] => 1 [modified] => 2023-11-08 18:17:29 [modified_by] => 64 [modified_by_name] => Antonella Ferrucci [publish_up] => 2023-10-28 09:08:28 [publish_down] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [images] => {"image_intro":"","image_sp_full":"images\/2023\/10\/28\/231028_La_terra_del_noi_06_ant.jpg","image_sp_thumb":"images\/2023\/10\/28\/231028_La_terra_del_noi_06_ant_thumbnail.jpg","image_sp_medium":"images\/2023\/10\/28\/231028_La_terra_del_noi_06_ant_medium.jpg","image_sp_large":"images\/2023\/10\/28\/231028_La_terra_del_noi_06_ant_large.jpg","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {"urla":false,"urlatext":"","targeta":"","urlb":false,"urlbtext":"","targetb":"","urlc":false,"urlctext":"","targetc":""} [attribs] => {"article_layout":"","show_title":"","link_titles":"","show_tags":"","show_intro":"","info_block_position":"","info_block_show_title":"","show_category":"","link_category":"","show_parent_category":"","link_parent_category":"","show_associations":"","show_author":"","link_author":"","show_create_date":"","show_modify_date":"","show_publish_date":"","show_item_navigation":"","show_icons":"","show_print_icon":"","show_email_icon":"","show_vote":"","show_hits":"","show_noauth":"","urls_position":"","alternative_readmore":"","article_page_title":"","show_publishing_options":"","show_article_options":"","show_urls_images_backend":"","show_urls_images_frontend":"","spfeatured_image":"images\/2023\/10\/28\/231028_La_terra_del_noi_06_ant.jpg","spfeatured_image_alt":"","post_format":"standard","gallery":"","audio":"","video":"","helix_ultimate_video":"","helix_ultimate_article_format":"standard","helix_ultimate_image":"images\/2023\/10\/28\/231028_La_terra_del_noi_06_ant.jpg","link_title":"","link_url":"","quote_text":"","quote_author":"","post_status":""} [metadata] => {"robots":"","author":"","rights":"","xreference":""} [metakey] => [metadesc] => [access] => 1 [hits] => 288 [xreference] => [featured] => 1 [language] => en-GB [on_img_default] => 0 [readmore] => 9515 [ordering] => 0 [category_title] => EN - The land of We [category_route] => oikonomia/it-la-terra-del-noi [category_access] => 1 [category_alias] => en-the-land-of-we [published] => 1 [parents_published] => 1 [lft] => 106 [author] => Luigino Bruni [author_email] => ferrucci.anto@gmail.com [parent_title] => Oikonomia [parent_id] => 1025 [parent_route] => oikonomia [parent_alias] => oikonomia [rating] => 0 [rating_count] => 0 [alternative_readmore] => [layout] => [params] => Joomla\Registry\Registry Object ( [data:protected] => stdClass Object ( [article_layout] => _:default [show_title] => 1 [link_titles] => 1 [show_intro] => 1 [info_block_position] => 0 [info_block_show_title] => 1 [show_category] => 1 [link_category] => 1 [show_parent_category] => 1 [link_parent_category] => 1 [show_associations] => 0 [flags] => 1 [show_author] => 0 [link_author] => 0 [show_create_date] => 1 [show_modify_date] => 0 [show_publish_date] => 1 [show_item_navigation] => 1 [show_vote] => 0 [show_readmore] => 0 [show_readmore_title] => 0 [readmore_limit] => 100 [show_tags] => 1 [show_icons] => 1 [show_print_icon] => 1 [show_email_icon] => 1 [show_hits] => 0 [record_hits] => 1 [show_noauth] => 0 [urls_position] => 1 [captcha] => [show_publishing_options] => 1 [show_article_options] => 1 [save_history] => 1 [history_limit] => 10 [show_urls_images_frontend] => 0 [show_urls_images_backend] => 1 [targeta] => 0 [targetb] => 0 [targetc] => 0 [float_intro] => left [float_fulltext] => left [category_layout] => _:blog [show_category_heading_title_text] => 0 [show_category_title] => 0 [show_description] => 0 [show_description_image] => 0 [maxLevel] => 0 [show_empty_categories] => 0 [show_no_articles] => 0 [show_subcat_desc] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles] => 0 [show_cat_tags] => 1 [show_base_description] => 1 [maxLevelcat] => -1 [show_empty_categories_cat] => 0 [show_subcat_desc_cat] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles_cat] => 0 [num_leading_articles] => 0 [num_intro_articles] => 14 [num_columns] => 2 [num_links] => 0 [multi_column_order] => 1 [show_subcategory_content] => -1 [show_pagination_limit] => 1 [filter_field] => hide [show_headings] => 1 [list_show_date] => 0 [date_format] => [list_show_hits] => 1 [list_show_author] => 1 [list_show_votes] => 0 [list_show_ratings] => 0 [orderby_pri] => none [orderby_sec] => rdate [order_date] => published [show_pagination] => 2 [show_pagination_results] => 1 [show_featured] => show [show_feed_link] => 1 [feed_summary] => 0 [feed_show_readmore] => 0 [sef_advanced] => 1 [sef_ids] => 1 [custom_fields_enable] => 1 [show_page_heading] => 0 [layout_type] => blog [menu_text] => 1 [menu_show] => 1 [secure] => 0 [helixultimatemenulayout] => {"width":600,"menualign":"right","megamenu":0,"showtitle":1,"faicon":"","customclass":"","dropdown":"right","badge":"","badge_position":"","badge_bg_color":"","badge_text_color":"","layout":[]} [helixultimate_enable_page_title] => 1 [helixultimate_page_title_alt] => Oikonomia [helixultimate_page_subtitle] => La terra del noi [helixultimate_page_title_heading] => h2 [page_title] => The land of We [page_description] => [page_rights] => [robots] => [access-view] => 1 ) [initialized:protected] => 1 [separator] => . ) [displayDate] => 2023-10-28 09:01:10 [tags] => Joomla\CMS\Helper\TagsHelper Object ( [tagsChanged:protected] => [replaceTags:protected] => [typeAlias] => [itemTags] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [tag_id] => 191 [id] => 191 [parent_id] => 1 [lft] => 379 [rgt] => 380 [level] => 1 [path] => la-terra-del-noi [title] => La terra del 'noi' [alias] => la-terra-del-noi [note] => [description] => [published] => 1 [checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [access] => 1 [params] => {} [metadesc] => [metakey] => [metadata] => {} [created_user_id] => 64 [created_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [created_by_alias] => [modified_user_id] => 0 [modified_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [images] => {} [urls] => {} [hits] => 1594 [language] => * [version] => 1 [publish_up] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [publish_down] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 ) ) ) [slug] => 19617:the-prophecy-of-a-market-based-on-trust-alone [parent_slug] => 1025:oikonomia [catslug] => 1168:en-the-land-of-we [event] => stdClass Object ( [afterDisplayTitle] => [beforeDisplayContent] => [afterDisplayContent] => ) [text] =>

The land of We/6 - The Neapolitan Civil Economy of the eighteenth century and Francesco Fuoco

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on 28/10/2023

The idea that exchange is a ‘game’ where the gains of one party are equal and opposite to the losses of the other, is often the first difficulty that a teacher encounters in the first lessons of economics. Students approach economic science with the belief that the market is a place of ‘zero-sum’ (+1/-1) relationships. It is difficult to convey the idea that in economic exchange the golden law is mutual advantage and therefore the gains of one party also correspond to gains for the other and when this mutual advantage does not occur, the market is distorted and denied and ends up resembling war, robbery or athletics (the sports metaphor for the economy is almost always wrong). Behind the bad reputation that economic operators have enjoyed for centuries, was the same mistake that my students make today. If the market is really a relationship where one party enriches itself at the expense of the other, it becomes necessary to protect the weak party, restrict the area of exchanges and then view merchants and bankers with great ethical distrust. Religious prohibitions on interest-bearing loans only reinforced a negativity that already existed. Merchants and economic and financial operators were well aware that the market was a ‘positive sum game’; they knew this because it was based on contracts, which when carried out in freedom reveal the mutually beneficial nature of the parties - why should I give my free consent to a predatory relationship? In the same way, they knew that the mutual advantage was often asymmetrical (+4, +1) due to different information and power balances. However, when the contract generated a minus somewhere (+2,-1), they knew that they were exiting the economy and entering into theft, leaving behind physiology and entering into the pathology of the market.

[jcfields] => Array ( ) [type] => intro [oddeven] => item-odd )
The prophecy of a market based on trust alone

The prophecy of a market based on trust alone

The land of We/6 - The Neapolitan Civil Economy of the eighteenth century and Francesco Fuoco by Luigino Bruni published in Avvenire on 28/10/2023 The idea that exchange is a ‘game’ where the gains of one party are equal and opposite to the losses of the other, is often the first difficulty tha...
stdClass Object
(
    [id] => 19607
    [title] => Lend, but without making anyone despair
    [alias] => lend-but-without-making-anyone-despair
    [introtext] => 

The land of We/5 - Soul of Civil Economy, Abbot Antomio Genovesi was persecuted for his ideas

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on 21/10/2023

The debates around usury, which have accompanied many centuries of European history, are the tip of a very deep and vast iceberg, which directly concerns the common good, the poor and social justice. It was not, nor is not, only a matter for specialists in finance or economic ethics, but it is at the heart of the social pact and therefore of the life and wellbeing of communities. It should therefore come as no surprise that not only economists and theologians but also philosophers, writers and humanists have always written about usury.

[fulltext] =>

Luther's Reformation, and the consequent Catholic Counter-Reformation, also greatly influenced economic ethics and attitudes towards usury. Catholic theologians and preachers from the second half of the sixteenth century, very worried and at times even terrified by the harmful effects of individual freedom of conscience not mediated by ecclesiastical authority, created a capillary system of control of all ethically sensitive actions, including those related to economics and finance. And so, more or less intentionally, the doctrine on usury (and in general, on freedom of enterprise and profits) regressed by at least four centuries. They forgot the reflections of the Franciscan masters and brought the tenor and level of the debates and prohibitions on interests and profits, back to those found in the treatises of the end of the first millennium.

The mid-eighteenth century saw a new golden age of economic ethics. Authors such as Muratori and Genovesi resumed the debate on profits, money and interest where civil humanism had left it, and wrote beautiful pages. They did not omit the damage caused by of usury which they studied a lot, they opposed them, but they did not even forget the essentiality of credit for a new society finally free from the bonds of feudalism. And so the Civil Economy was born, one of the brightest chapters in Italian and European history and Abbot Genovesi was its soul.

Antonio Genovesi was first a theologian and then an economist. He did not have an easy life with the Church of his time, which removed him from teaching theology (1745) advising him to move to the chair of ethics. He was accused of atheism and heresy; he was much loved by students and people, but "he was persecuted so ferociously and beyond death if to avoid greater damage it was prudent to bury him secretly, without a tombstone and with the pitiful "complicity" of the Capuchins of Sant'Efremo Nuovo" (Lina Sansone Vagni, Studi e Ricerche Francescane 23, 1994). His Lezioni di Economia civile were included in the Index by decree of 23.6.1817. In his autobiography he wrote: "I, who had begun to be bored by these theological intrigues and who was beginning to have a horror of such turbulent and often bloody studies, did more: I took back my manuscripts and I resolved permanently not to think about these matters anymore (Autobiografia, lettere e altri scritti, p. 22).

The great theological difficulties that Genovesi encountered led him to become an economist, and to be the first to occupy a Chair of Economics. Teaching, studying and travelling around his Kingdom of Naples, he also wrote important pages on usury and money, where his theological and biblical competence was vital for him. His painful, forcibly diverse academic career produced some amazing pages. Let's look at some of them.

 As a theologian, Genovesi was well aware of the philosophical and theological objections to the payment of interest on money, usury or interest, which he nevertheless distinguished (Lezioni, Vol. II, Ch. 13, §1) - but he knew that these abstract prohibitions had greatly complicated the lives of honest merchants and created a hypocritical Catholic culture, where no one could lend but everyone lent and borrowed. Hence his tenacious and free struggle to unmask these hypocrisies and modernize his people in Naples.

 We find his theoretical and rhetorical masterpiece on usury and credit where he is in discussion with theologians, whom he calls ‘my enemies’: "Theologians therefore face two difficulties. 1. That the doctrine of usury is repugnant to biblical doctrines. 2. That it is opposed to the authority of the fathers and theologians’. On the second difficulty, it refers "to the learned work of the late Marquis Maffei", where it is shown "that it is not true, that the fathers and theologians were all of this opinion, as long as one knows how to explain the state of the matter" (§XIX). And then he confronts the theologians directly, with a wonderful style: "I would like to be in a council of those most learned and most holy fathers and ask them two questions. 1. If one, who is not in need, asks me for a benefit for pure luxury, for enjoyment, for greed or for wealth, am I, fathers, obliged to lend it to him? 2. And if I am in need, and I cannot I live except by asserting my own, can I say to this man, brother, let us help each other; I will grant your favour with my things, but you in return, will give me the current price of the loan; am I entitled to ask him this question? Until I hear the answer of this council to my two questions, I am certain that neither the fathers nor theologians were ever against usury or the terms of our question" (§XIX). Reading the quality of these ancient debates increases sadness in the face of the ‘quality’ of our talk shows.

Then he continues and enters the field of biblical exegesis, showing us a Genovesi who is a student of Erasmus and above all of Muratori, true pioneers of the scientific and free study of the Scriptures, who, we will see, goes so far as to rectify the official translations of the Gospels: "Let's start from the Old Testament. The law of Moses in Deuteronomy (23:20) is: "Non foeneraberis fratri tu pauperi; foeneraberis alienigeno" (you will not lend to your poor brother, you will lend to the foreigner). Let us develop this law. 1. He gives or leaves the right to give usury to those who were not Jews (this is the alienigeno or foreigner)". And from here he masterfully concludes: "Therefore he did not consider usury as contrary to jus and the law of nature. God does not annul the law of nature, because God can neither annul nor deny Himself. 2. He forbids usurious lending to the poor (Jewish) brother” (§20).

And so he formulates his general theory on lending and usury: "Therefore the main proposition is: you have the right to give usury to your brothers; the exception is, provided they are not poor." 20 This is his only solution: the Bible forbids interest on loans to the poor but does not condemn it in general.

After refuting his critics who quoted the Old Testament to deny any interest, he moves on to the New Testament. First of all, he carries out a very up-to-date and correct operation: he reads the gospel together with the entire Hebrew Bible. Thus Genovesi places Luke's famous phrase about lending without asking for interest (Lk. 6:35), which theologians used to condemn any interest, within the consideration he has just made on the book of Deuteronomy and therefore in the context of the prohibition of lending to the poor with interest. Genovesi paraphrases Luke 6:35 ff. and offers us a fascinating translation: «You do no good, he tells them, except to those from whom you hope to receive. Therefore, your principle is to do only what gains for you. Vile maxim that subverts humanity. All the rascals, the scoundrels, the greedy and the thieves, do the same. In what, then, will the grace that is given to you be placed? What gratitude do you deserve from God for this? You see these tax collectors lend to those, where they hope for more usury; you are no different to them if you too offer these crooked benefits to the poor to attract their substances to you? Therefore, if you want to be just and virtuous, as the Most High requires, and claim to be called his children, love your enemies too, do good to them: lend to them without disappointing the needy and the poor of the hope they have had in your generosity, and without making them despair». (§21).

And now comes his true stroke of genius (and culture). As a teacher of Greek and Latin, Genovesi gave his fellow theologians a lesson, still very relevant and worth further consideration. Let's see how. He said: “This precept is therefore in conformity with the first part of the law of Deuteronomy. Is there anything that favours our theologians?” (§21). Genovesi, however, realized that his translation took some liberties that may have seemed intrusive, that is, his discourse on the poor and needy. He wrote: "But let us account for some words that I have included in my paraphrase, which those who read the versions will believe to be intrusive. I said before that Jesus Christ speaks in the present place of the needy and the poor, which is not expressed in the precept” (§22). Genovesi maintained that the reference to prohibition was addressed to the poor because such was the original contrast in Deuteronomy (which Luke implicitly quoted), and I add, because these words come after the sermon of the Beatitudes that opens with ‘blessed are the poor’ (6:20). It should then also be noted that the Latin text of the Bible (the Vulgate) in that passage of Luke had the word ‘indiget’, that is‘ needy ’,‘indigent’, a word which was omitted in the Italian translation.

But the most beautiful, truly moving part of his courageous and innovative exegesis is on the word hope. Current translations, starting with the Latin Vulgate, translate apelpizo (the Greek word in Luke) with ‘without hoping for anything in return. Whereas Genovesi translated it differently and I include it here in its entirety: "I said: without disappointing the needy and the poor of the hope, which they had in your generosity, and without making them despair, because, although the compilers of the variants of the New Testament omitted it, some sacred critics have observed that using the accusative masculine, the απελπιζω (apelpizo) should be taken in an active sense and means not to cause despair, in which sense it is used by many of the best Greek writers". And so he proposes to also amend Jerome’s version (which here reads ‘nihil inde sperantes’: lend without hoping for anything): "The Latin version could have been: mutuum date, neminem desperare facientes" (§22), that is: lend, without making anyone despair! This is why Genovesi concluded his reasoning with these words: "Because this precept clearly speaks of lending to the poor and because it is more appropriate to the text, to read the verb apelpizo in the sense of not reducing anyone to despair" (§22). Awesome! Many years ago when I began to study and write about economics and then about ethics and finally about the Bible, I hoped that one day I would be able to find, understand, enjoy and help others to enjoy a difficult and beautiful page, like this one of Genovesi. Perhaps his biblical exegesis is not the best or the only one, but his economic exegesis of those biblical passages remains unsurpassed and full of civil hope.

Usury is a great social evil because it reduces people, the poor, to despair. The despair of the poor is the first measure of our usury, from that of some banks to that of an irresponsible civilization that plunders the earth and throws its children and grandchildren into despair.

[checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [catid] => 1168 [created] => 2023-10-21 09:03:25 [created_by] => 64 [created_by_alias] => Luigino Bruni [state] => 1 [modified] => 2023-10-26 12:41:45 [modified_by] => 64 [modified_by_name] => Antonella Ferrucci [publish_up] => 2023-10-21 09:16:26 [publish_down] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [images] => {"image_intro":"","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {"urla":false,"urlatext":"","targeta":"","urlb":false,"urlbtext":"","targetb":"","urlc":false,"urlctext":"","targetc":""} [attribs] => {"article_layout":"","show_title":"","link_titles":"","show_tags":"","show_intro":"","info_block_position":"","info_block_show_title":"","show_category":"","link_category":"","show_parent_category":"","link_parent_category":"","show_associations":"","show_author":"","link_author":"","show_create_date":"","show_modify_date":"","show_publish_date":"","show_item_navigation":"","show_icons":"","show_print_icon":"","show_email_icon":"","show_vote":"","show_hits":"","show_noauth":"","urls_position":"","alternative_readmore":"","article_page_title":"","show_publishing_options":"","show_article_options":"","show_urls_images_backend":"","show_urls_images_frontend":"","helix_ultimate_image":"images\/2023\/10\/21\/231021_La_terra_del_noi_05_A_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_image_alt_txt":"","spfeatured_image":"images\/2023\/10\/21\/231021_La_terra_del_noi_05_A_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_article_format":"standard","helix_ultimate_audio":"","helix_ultimate_gallery":"","helix_ultimate_video":"","video":""} [metadata] => {"robots":"","author":"","rights":"","xreference":""} [metakey] => [metadesc] => [access] => 1 [hits] => 357 [xreference] => [featured] => 1 [language] => en-GB [on_img_default] => 0 [readmore] => 11105 [ordering] => 0 [category_title] => EN - The land of We [category_route] => oikonomia/it-la-terra-del-noi [category_access] => 1 [category_alias] => en-the-land-of-we [published] => 1 [parents_published] => 1 [lft] => 106 [author] => Luigino Bruni [author_email] => ferrucci.anto@gmail.com [parent_title] => Oikonomia [parent_id] => 1025 [parent_route] => oikonomia [parent_alias] => oikonomia [rating] => 0 [rating_count] => 0 [alternative_readmore] => [layout] => [params] => Joomla\Registry\Registry Object ( [data:protected] => stdClass Object ( [article_layout] => _:default [show_title] => 1 [link_titles] => 1 [show_intro] => 1 [info_block_position] => 0 [info_block_show_title] => 1 [show_category] => 1 [link_category] => 1 [show_parent_category] => 1 [link_parent_category] => 1 [show_associations] => 0 [flags] => 1 [show_author] => 0 [link_author] => 0 [show_create_date] => 1 [show_modify_date] => 0 [show_publish_date] => 1 [show_item_navigation] => 1 [show_vote] => 0 [show_readmore] => 0 [show_readmore_title] => 0 [readmore_limit] => 100 [show_tags] => 1 [show_icons] => 1 [show_print_icon] => 1 [show_email_icon] => 1 [show_hits] => 0 [record_hits] => 1 [show_noauth] => 0 [urls_position] => 1 [captcha] => [show_publishing_options] => 1 [show_article_options] => 1 [save_history] => 1 [history_limit] => 10 [show_urls_images_frontend] => 0 [show_urls_images_backend] => 1 [targeta] => 0 [targetb] => 0 [targetc] => 0 [float_intro] => left [float_fulltext] => left [category_layout] => _:blog [show_category_heading_title_text] => 0 [show_category_title] => 0 [show_description] => 0 [show_description_image] => 0 [maxLevel] => 0 [show_empty_categories] => 0 [show_no_articles] => 0 [show_subcat_desc] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles] => 0 [show_cat_tags] => 1 [show_base_description] => 1 [maxLevelcat] => -1 [show_empty_categories_cat] => 0 [show_subcat_desc_cat] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles_cat] => 0 [num_leading_articles] => 0 [num_intro_articles] => 14 [num_columns] => 2 [num_links] => 0 [multi_column_order] => 1 [show_subcategory_content] => -1 [show_pagination_limit] => 1 [filter_field] => hide [show_headings] => 1 [list_show_date] => 0 [date_format] => [list_show_hits] => 1 [list_show_author] => 1 [list_show_votes] => 0 [list_show_ratings] => 0 [orderby_pri] => none [orderby_sec] => rdate [order_date] => published [show_pagination] => 2 [show_pagination_results] => 1 [show_featured] => show [show_feed_link] => 1 [feed_summary] => 0 [feed_show_readmore] => 0 [sef_advanced] => 1 [sef_ids] => 1 [custom_fields_enable] => 1 [show_page_heading] => 0 [layout_type] => blog [menu_text] => 1 [menu_show] => 1 [secure] => 0 [helixultimatemenulayout] => {"width":600,"menualign":"right","megamenu":0,"showtitle":1,"faicon":"","customclass":"","dropdown":"right","badge":"","badge_position":"","badge_bg_color":"","badge_text_color":"","layout":[]} [helixultimate_enable_page_title] => 1 [helixultimate_page_title_alt] => Oikonomia [helixultimate_page_subtitle] => La terra del noi [helixultimate_page_title_heading] => h2 [page_title] => The land of We [page_description] => [page_rights] => [robots] => [access-view] => 1 ) [initialized:protected] => 1 [separator] => . ) [displayDate] => 2023-10-21 09:03:25 [tags] => Joomla\CMS\Helper\TagsHelper Object ( [tagsChanged:protected] => [replaceTags:protected] => [typeAlias] => [itemTags] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [tag_id] => 191 [id] => 191 [parent_id] => 1 [lft] => 379 [rgt] => 380 [level] => 1 [path] => la-terra-del-noi [title] => La terra del 'noi' [alias] => la-terra-del-noi [note] => [description] => [published] => 1 [checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [access] => 1 [params] => {} [metadesc] => [metakey] => [metadata] => {} [created_user_id] => 64 [created_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [created_by_alias] => [modified_user_id] => 0 [modified_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [images] => {} [urls] => {} [hits] => 1594 [language] => * [version] => 1 [publish_up] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [publish_down] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 ) ) ) [slug] => 19607:lend-but-without-making-anyone-despair [parent_slug] => 1025:oikonomia [catslug] => 1168:en-the-land-of-we [event] => stdClass Object ( [afterDisplayTitle] => [beforeDisplayContent] => [afterDisplayContent] => ) [text] =>

The land of We/5 - Soul of Civil Economy, Abbot Antomio Genovesi was persecuted for his ideas

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on 21/10/2023

The debates around usury, which have accompanied many centuries of European history, are the tip of a very deep and vast iceberg, which directly concerns the common good, the poor and social justice. It was not, nor is not, only a matter for specialists in finance or economic ethics, but it is at the heart of the social pact and therefore of the life and wellbeing of communities. It should therefore come as no surprise that not only economists and theologians but also philosophers, writers and humanists have always written about usury.

[jcfields] => Array ( ) [type] => intro [oddeven] => item-even )
Lend, but without making anyone despair

Lend, but without making anyone despair

The land of We/5 - Soul of Civil Economy, Abbot Antomio Genovesi was persecuted for his ideas by Luigino Bruni published in Avvenire on 21/10/2023 The debates around usury, which have accompanied many centuries of European history, are the tip of a very deep and vast iceberg, which directly conce...
stdClass Object
(
    [id] => 19592
    [title] => The goods, the interests and the leaven of the gift
    [alias] => the-goods-the-interests-and-the-leaven-of-the-gift
    [introtext] => 

The land of We/4 - The limits of the mutual advantage of the market, the new atmosphere in the age of Muratori

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on 14/10/2023

The birth of modern Political Economy is closely linked to the affirmation of a new idea about the Common Good. Ancient and medieval thought gave rise to it from the willing and conscious renunciation of the private good of individuals. In the eighteenth century, however, people began to say that the common good is the (unintentional) result of the pursuit of one's own interests, without the need for any renunciation. No one in the market loses anything, everyone gains. This is the heart of the discourse hidden behind the metaphor of Adam Smith's "invisible hand", introduced a few years earlier by the Neapolitan Ferdinando Galiani (Della Moneta, 1750) and already present, in essence, also in the other great Neapolitan, Giambattista Vico. A revolution well expressed by Smith: "I have never known much good done by those who affected to trade for the public good" (The Wealth of Nations, 1776).

[fulltext] =>

Neapolitan and Italian Civil Economy thought differently about this and continue to do so: while recognizing the mutual advantage mechanisms of the market as the golden law of economic and social life, it never thought that only the mutual advantage of the invisible hand was sufficient for the common good. They knew the mutual advantage but did not make it the only social or economic language for the civilisation of peoples. Antonio Ludovico Muratori (1672, Vignola - 1750, Modena), an immense figure, had very clear ideas about this. In those years, after the seventeenth century, which was also the golden century of the Counter-Reformation and the Inquisition (which, among other things, Muratori also covered), a reform movement began in Europe. In the ecclesial sphere, first the election of Benedict XIII (in 1724), who we have already mentioned in previous articles because of his great action for the Grain Banks, and then, after the brief parenthesis of Clement XII, of Benedict XIV (in 1740), marked a real season of social and economic renewal as well. Benedict XIV, in addition to writing the encyclical Vix pervenit (1745) on the legitimization of interest-bearing lending, was an economic reformer, and carried out an agrarian reform to reintroduce the biblical institution of "gleaning" for poor farmers.

The Muratorian age was a season of greater tolerance for new and divergent ideas, a climate that favoured the emergence of great social intellectuals that the seventeenth century had not generated; the Catholic talents of that century tended towards the least "dangerous" areas of art, music and poetry. Muratori was an impressive and gigantic intellectual figure. He made fundamental contributions to historical studies, including 27 volumes of the Rerum Italicarum Scriptores, 6 volumes of the Antiquitates Italicae Medii Aevi, 12 volumes of the Annals of Italy. He was the teacher of the young Antonio Genovesi, he wrote important economic pages both in La carità cristiana (1723) and in Cristianesimo Felice (1743) where he described and praised the socio-economic experiment of the Jesuit "reductions" in Paraguay. The year before his death he published a summary of his thought in Della publica felicità, a book whose title, for at least a century, represented the motto of the research project of Italian economists and has now been revived. Among the many topics touched and renewed by Muratori, two are very important: the theological work to reform economic-civilian life and the coexistence of the idea of mutual advantage and that of gift.

After almost two centuries of the Counter-Reformation, Muratori understood that without a profound reform of "devotion" (devotion) and popular piety, which in those centuries was intertwined with magic and superstition, Catholic society would have remained definitively blocked. And therefore the priest Muratori criticized the devotions to save devotion: "Books of devotion and piety abound in the Catholic Church, authors who propose some new devotion and divonzioncelle (little devotions) every day", (Della regolata devozione dei cristiani, Preface, 1747). His criticisms provoked many harsh reactions, accusations of Protestantism and Jansenism, a fate common to true reformers.

The main reason for his religious criticism is very important: "We must clearly understand a very important truth: God commands us nothing that is not for our own good, that is, to love and seek our happiness even in our present life" (p. 5). Because, he explains, the whole of Revelation is oriented to our happiness: "God wants us to resist the breaths of disordered lust, anger, gluttony, revenge, and other similar vigorous passions: is this not for our benefit?" (p. 17) In a Church entirely centred on the souls of purgatory, on the valley of tears, on penances, on pain and on the theology of atonement, Muratori’s work shines out as a hymn to life and the person, as a Humanism, where God is man’s first ally for his happiness. It is an entirely biblical and evangelical vision. The God-human relationship should be read as mutual benefit and reciprocity: His good is ours, ours is His. Beautiful. From this humanism comes his criticism of the cult of the saints and Our Lady, and he even goes so far as to say something revolutionary: that the devotion of the saints "is not necessary and essential to the Christian" (p. 205).

The economic reason for his long battle for the reduction of too many holydays of obligation in the Catholic Church is also very important. On feast days, Christians could not work, so "the multiplicity of feasts clearly prejudices and burdens those who have to earn their bread with the arts and the toil of their hands" (p. 10). And he added: " The saints do not need our glory, and on the contrary the poor need bread, nor should it ever be thought that the saints, so full of charity, love the fact that to honour them unnecessarily the poor are defrauded of their necessary portion of food" (p. 211). Again the lack of mutual benefit. And he concluded masterfully: "Our devotion is for our profit" (p. 212). A few years later, his student Antonio Genovesi did not fail to approve this vision of Muratori on religion in his Lessons (chap. 10, IX, vol. 2). His most complex and long pastoral theological battle was that against the "bloody vow" (or the vow of the "Palermitans") that theologians, bishops and the Jesuits recommended for Christians. Those who took that vow had to defend the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception of the Virgin at the cost of their lives. Muratori judged this vow as superstitious and illicit. His battle began in 1714 with the book De ingeniorum moderatione (I7I4). The reason for his opposition lies, here too, in the lack of mutual advantage: even if the Immaculate Conception were certain (which Muratori did not consider certain but only probable), Mary does not obtain an advantage if Christians give their lives to defend a dogma: «Mary does not need dubious praise, nor an imprudent sacrifice. On the other hand, you need your life" (p. 269). Muratori therefore criticized a Church that saw human sacrifice as a currency to give glory to God. Hence his criticism of the excesses of the "Marian devotions", of the proliferation of the "Confraternities of the slaves of the Mother of God" (Regulata Divozione, p. 280). The only good devotions are those, as he said at the end of his book, "which return to the glory of religion and to the profit of the people" (p. 283). Alfonso Maria de’ Liguori, who respected Muratori, was a very harsh critic of his stigmatization of the "bloody vow": appealing to the authority of Angelico, he wrote: "It is still certain that such a cult can be a cause of martyrdom" (A. Maria de Liguori, Delle Glorie di Maria, ch. V, 1750).

Turning now to the second aspect of his thought, in his beautiful book Christian Charity, we also find the Monti di Pietà: «The industrious charity of the faithful then invented other kinds of Monti di Pietà. Such as the Sacred Bank of Flour, of which Blessed Jerome of Verona was the main instructor in Modena and in other cities". The Monte della Farina was a variant of the Grain Banks - there would be a lot to study about these ancient institutions! And then he continued: "The task of the directors of such Monti is to buy grain, of good quality, with the greatest possible advantage at convenient times and to do this with no less diligence than if it were their own business, to resell it, converted into flour, without any interest, to those people who are in need ... Too many people like that easy job of making their fortune by sucking the blood of the poor." And then he also told us that "a Hemp Bank was established in Bologna, an abundant city of Pious Works" (p. 315). With regard to the Monti di Pietà, he continued: "Monti Sacri de i Pegni (Pawnshops), founded in recent centuries by the piety of Christians, for the glory of Catholicism in Italy and Flanders" (p. 310). Those banks were truly a glory of "Catholicism", even in centuries which were ambivalent for the Catholic Church. It is important how Muratori explained the operation of these Monti, where those who lend money do so "with the intention of receiving back nothing more than the capital lent..., and to demand more would be to seek only our own interest and not the benefit of others" (p. 311). The only legitimate interest in the Banks of the Poor, is what is required “for the reimbursement of the expenses for the maintenance of the Officers" (p. 312). A Muratori, therefore, who is so fond of "mutual advantage" that he even puts it at the centre of his criticism of religion, but who recognizes that in some areas of economic and social life mutual advantage is too little, because there is a need to register the gift. In religion, mutual advantage was on the side of the poor; in the Monti, only the gift was on their side, and therefore on the side of the Common Good.

Muratori (along with Scipione Maffei) recognized the legitimacy of interest in most commercial affairs, but knew that there are human actions where mutual advantage does not work well. To remind us that the "invisible hand" works in many things but not in all, otherwise that hand becomes only an ideological tool to "suck the blood of the poor". The "good" common good is not born only from interests: it is also born from the gift, which is the leaven of the mass formed by interests. As emerges from his On Public Happiness, where we read: "The most ordinary desire, and father of many others, is that of our Private Good... Then, of a more sublime sphere, and of a nobler origin, there is another Desire, that of the Good of Society, of the Public Good, or of Public Happiness» (p. vi). Many goods come from the desire for the Private Good, but not all goods, because there are others that come from the love of the Common Good. These are two different goods, both essential. In the civic museum of Modena, there is a portrait of Blessed Gerolamo of Verona. The saint is holding a single cloth with the inscription: Mons charitatis. In the midst of the Counter-Reformation, the Church understood that there was a sanctity linked to the construction of the Monti and the Banks, and that setting up a Bank for the poor could be the only sign of a saint, there was no need for anything more "religious".

[checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [catid] => 1168 [created] => 2023-10-14 09:01:58 [created_by] => 64 [created_by_alias] => Luigino Bruni [state] => 1 [modified] => 2023-10-18 14:33:51 [modified_by] => 64 [modified_by_name] => Antonella Ferrucci [publish_up] => 2023-10-14 09:01:58 [publish_down] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [images] => {"image_intro":"","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {"urla":false,"urlatext":"","targeta":"","urlb":false,"urlbtext":"","targetb":"","urlc":false,"urlctext":"","targetc":""} [attribs] => {"article_layout":"","show_title":"","link_titles":"","show_tags":"","show_intro":"","info_block_position":"","info_block_show_title":"","show_category":"","link_category":"","show_parent_category":"","link_parent_category":"","show_associations":"","show_author":"","link_author":"","show_create_date":"","show_modify_date":"","show_publish_date":"","show_item_navigation":"","show_icons":"","show_print_icon":"","show_email_icon":"","show_vote":"","show_hits":"","show_noauth":"","urls_position":"","alternative_readmore":"","article_page_title":"","show_publishing_options":"","show_article_options":"","show_urls_images_backend":"","show_urls_images_frontend":"","helix_ultimate_image":"images\/2023\/10\/14\/231014_La_Terra_del_noi_4_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_image_alt_txt":"","spfeatured_image":"images\/2023\/10\/14\/231014_La_Terra_del_noi_4_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_article_format":"standard","helix_ultimate_audio":"","helix_ultimate_gallery":"","helix_ultimate_video":"","video":""} [metadata] => {"robots":"","author":"","rights":"","xreference":""} [metakey] => [metadesc] => [access] => 1 [hits] => 361 [xreference] => [featured] => 1 [language] => en-GB [on_img_default] => 0 [readmore] => 10560 [ordering] => 0 [category_title] => EN - The land of We [category_route] => oikonomia/it-la-terra-del-noi [category_access] => 1 [category_alias] => en-the-land-of-we [published] => 1 [parents_published] => 1 [lft] => 106 [author] => Luigino Bruni [author_email] => ferrucci.anto@gmail.com [parent_title] => Oikonomia [parent_id] => 1025 [parent_route] => oikonomia [parent_alias] => oikonomia [rating] => 0 [rating_count] => 0 [alternative_readmore] => [layout] => [params] => Joomla\Registry\Registry Object ( [data:protected] => stdClass Object ( [article_layout] => _:default [show_title] => 1 [link_titles] => 1 [show_intro] => 1 [info_block_position] => 0 [info_block_show_title] => 1 [show_category] => 1 [link_category] => 1 [show_parent_category] => 1 [link_parent_category] => 1 [show_associations] => 0 [flags] => 1 [show_author] => 0 [link_author] => 0 [show_create_date] => 1 [show_modify_date] => 0 [show_publish_date] => 1 [show_item_navigation] => 1 [show_vote] => 0 [show_readmore] => 0 [show_readmore_title] => 0 [readmore_limit] => 100 [show_tags] => 1 [show_icons] => 1 [show_print_icon] => 1 [show_email_icon] => 1 [show_hits] => 0 [record_hits] => 1 [show_noauth] => 0 [urls_position] => 1 [captcha] => [show_publishing_options] => 1 [show_article_options] => 1 [save_history] => 1 [history_limit] => 10 [show_urls_images_frontend] => 0 [show_urls_images_backend] => 1 [targeta] => 0 [targetb] => 0 [targetc] => 0 [float_intro] => left [float_fulltext] => left [category_layout] => _:blog [show_category_heading_title_text] => 0 [show_category_title] => 0 [show_description] => 0 [show_description_image] => 0 [maxLevel] => 0 [show_empty_categories] => 0 [show_no_articles] => 0 [show_subcat_desc] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles] => 0 [show_cat_tags] => 1 [show_base_description] => 1 [maxLevelcat] => -1 [show_empty_categories_cat] => 0 [show_subcat_desc_cat] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles_cat] => 0 [num_leading_articles] => 0 [num_intro_articles] => 14 [num_columns] => 2 [num_links] => 0 [multi_column_order] => 1 [show_subcategory_content] => -1 [show_pagination_limit] => 1 [filter_field] => hide [show_headings] => 1 [list_show_date] => 0 [date_format] => [list_show_hits] => 1 [list_show_author] => 1 [list_show_votes] => 0 [list_show_ratings] => 0 [orderby_pri] => none [orderby_sec] => rdate [order_date] => published [show_pagination] => 2 [show_pagination_results] => 1 [show_featured] => show [show_feed_link] => 1 [feed_summary] => 0 [feed_show_readmore] => 0 [sef_advanced] => 1 [sef_ids] => 1 [custom_fields_enable] => 1 [show_page_heading] => 0 [layout_type] => blog [menu_text] => 1 [menu_show] => 1 [secure] => 0 [helixultimatemenulayout] => {"width":600,"menualign":"right","megamenu":0,"showtitle":1,"faicon":"","customclass":"","dropdown":"right","badge":"","badge_position":"","badge_bg_color":"","badge_text_color":"","layout":[]} [helixultimate_enable_page_title] => 1 [helixultimate_page_title_alt] => Oikonomia [helixultimate_page_subtitle] => La terra del noi [helixultimate_page_title_heading] => h2 [page_title] => The land of We [page_description] => [page_rights] => [robots] => [access-view] => 1 ) [initialized:protected] => 1 [separator] => . ) [displayDate] => 2023-10-14 09:01:58 [tags] => Joomla\CMS\Helper\TagsHelper Object ( [tagsChanged:protected] => [replaceTags:protected] => [typeAlias] => [itemTags] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [tag_id] => 191 [id] => 191 [parent_id] => 1 [lft] => 379 [rgt] => 380 [level] => 1 [path] => la-terra-del-noi [title] => La terra del 'noi' [alias] => la-terra-del-noi [note] => [description] => [published] => 1 [checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [access] => 1 [params] => {} [metadesc] => [metakey] => [metadata] => {} [created_user_id] => 64 [created_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [created_by_alias] => [modified_user_id] => 0 [modified_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [images] => {} [urls] => {} [hits] => 1594 [language] => * [version] => 1 [publish_up] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [publish_down] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 ) ) ) [slug] => 19592:the-goods-the-interests-and-the-leaven-of-the-gift [parent_slug] => 1025:oikonomia [catslug] => 1168:en-the-land-of-we [event] => stdClass Object ( [afterDisplayTitle] => [beforeDisplayContent] => [afterDisplayContent] => ) [text] =>

The land of We/4 - The limits of the mutual advantage of the market, the new atmosphere in the age of Muratori

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on 14/10/2023

The birth of modern Political Economy is closely linked to the affirmation of a new idea about the Common Good. Ancient and medieval thought gave rise to it from the willing and conscious renunciation of the private good of individuals. In the eighteenth century, however, people began to say that the common good is the (unintentional) result of the pursuit of one's own interests, without the need for any renunciation. No one in the market loses anything, everyone gains. This is the heart of the discourse hidden behind the metaphor of Adam Smith's "invisible hand", introduced a few years earlier by the Neapolitan Ferdinando Galiani (Della Moneta, 1750) and already present, in essence, also in the other great Neapolitan, Giambattista Vico. A revolution well expressed by Smith: "I have never known much good done by those who affected to trade for the public good" (The Wealth of Nations, 1776).

[jcfields] => Array ( ) [type] => intro [oddeven] => item-odd )
The goods, the interests and the leaven of the gift

The goods, the interests and the leaven of the gift

The land of We/4 - The limits of the mutual advantage of the market, the new atmosphere in the age of Muratori by Luigino Bruni published in Avvenire on 14/10/2023 The birth of modern Political Economy is closely linked to the affirmation of a new idea about the Common Good. Ancient and medieval ...
stdClass Object
(
    [id] => 19590
    [title] => The ancient solidarity of «during»
    [alias] => the-ancient-solidarity-of-during
    [introtext] => 

The land of We/3 - In Latin capitalism the links are in the day to day dynamics of businesses and banks

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on 07/10/2023

The economic institutions of our meridian lands began in a hybrid way and continued so, as long as the way of doing business in the lands under the shadow of the Alps retained the characteristic and unique traits, which today are disappearing into the general melee. Following Augustine and Luther, the Protestant North distinguished the ‘city of God’ from the ‘city of man’ and therefore, the market from the gift, the contract from gratuitousness, solidarity from the enterprise, and profit from non-profit. In the Age of the Counter-Reformation, Latin Humanism reinforced the promiscuity between these worlds and regions. And so it generated parish priests who managed cooperatives and rural banks, entrepreneurial families, friars who embraced extreme poverty while founding banks for the poor.

[fulltext] =>

There are now many who think that the community, the Mediterranean and Catholic economy, that ‘land of We’ made up of close relationships and warm bonds, where street vendors sang songs in the streets (the Sicilian abanniata) and in the markets exchanged mostly words, has nothing good left to say; that Latin capitalism is gone forever where solidarity was not entrusted to 2% of profits because solidarity was implicit in the ordinary dynamics of businesses, banks and cooperatives; ours was the solidarity of the ‘during’, not that of the ‘later’. That Mediterranean world where wages were not left to the vicissitudes of the ‘labour market’ because that ‘salt’ was something more than and was different to a commodity. Life and suffering had taught that when work becomes a commodity, its salary-salt becomes too foolish to flavour good and wholesome meals. And so, what remains of communitarian economics is increasingly seen and treated like the old “Singer” (sewing machine) of our Aunt or the “Letter 35” (typewriter) of our Grandfather.

It is clear that the community is ambivalent because real life is ambivalent. And therefore the community is life and death, siblinghood and fratricide, friendship and conflicts, hugs and fights, tears of joy and pain, together. And a society that only sees relationships as deception, that adores the free individual because he is free from all human relationships other than those of the market, contracts and social networks (which are the same thing: the ‘like’ of Facebook is the ‘like’ of the sovereign consumer), can only flee from the community, from every community made of flesh and blood.

Yet there must be something wrong in all this discourse, in this discussion which is becoming the only one, something that the environmental crisis is clearly revealing to us every day.

In these weeks we are seeing that the Franciscans had a different idea of person, community and economy. They made the entirely charismatic choice, to go and live in the heart of the new medieval and Renaissance commercial cities. They left the valleys and took to the streets and became friends with the merchants and citizens, and often they understood them. And when they wrote about economics and money, they did not look at the world from the level of theological treatises, generally written by those who had never seen real merchants and bankers (the impression that the theologians who wrote about economics made on merchants is very similar to that of politicians today, who write laws for an economy they do not know Instead, they placed themselves at the low level of the market stalls, and there they met the eyes of the mercatores and another economy was born, different kinds of banks emerged, other kinds of Monti.

Those Franciscans were able to innovate because they got their hands dirty with economic matters, even running the risk of making mistakes, because the earth is changed only by those who walk on it and do not take refuge in the ethereal purity of the heavens; the new heavens cannot be found without the new lands. And they made mistakes, including the serious one, of the anti-Semitic tone of their battles against usury, based on the idea that it was only the Jews who lent money at usury. That idea was wrong, because a lot of usury, especially the main kind, was carried out by good Christians, rich banking families who lent to rich Christian merchants, cardinals and popes; the Jews were left almost only with small loans, sitting on their benches under the awning with the red carpet. Everyone saw them there, while the large usurious contracts of the powerful Strozzi, Medici or Chigi remained invisible to most people, including friars; big finance has always had its strength in invisibility. Many Catholic usurers had brilliant political careers (Massimo Giansante, The Honoured Usurer, 2008), in a European finance that, unlike the bad anti-Jewish legend, was also, and in some cases above all, in Christian hands (F. Trivellato, Ebrei e capitalismo: storia di una leggenda dimenticata, 2021).

We find it very difficult to understand the profound reasons for the ancient moral struggle against usury. The main one is a clear and strong principle: ‘you cannot profit from future time, because that is the time of children and descendants’. This is why our generation is a usurious generation, because it does not know "how to think about the common good and the future of children" (Laudate Deum, 60), those "children who will pay for the damages of our actions" (LD, 33). A usurer is anyone who speculates on their children’s time today. The poor of today are also and above all the children present and future, who must be protected from our individual and collective usury.

Let's go back to the wonderful history of the Franciscans, which today here in Assisi (where I am for the ‘Economy of Francis’) stands out with a dazzling light of the future. Francis is the name of tomorrow, not just of yesterday.

When the action of the minor friars in founding the Monti di Pietà (which gradually became banks in the cities), was attenuated with the Council of Trent, the Capuchin friars took up the baton and for over two centuries built hundreds of Grain Banks. The minors operated mainly in the cities of the Centre-North, because in those monetary economies it was essential to circumvent usury with the great intuition (of Jewish origin) of the pawnbrokers who became their Monti di Pietà. There, the families’ possessions (clothes, furniture, work tools, jewellery: almost everything, except weapons) were liquidated in money, which was essential in the city where the division of labour prevailed. In fact, there were few objects pledged to the Monte (pawned) that were redeemed upon repayment of the loan, because those Monti performed a mixed loan-purchase function. In the countryside and in the South, on the other hand, where the economy was mainly non-monetary, the Grain Banks were born, with the simple and extraordinary innovation of wheat used as currency. In the countryside and in those subsistence economies there were few assets which could be pledged, and so the guarantees, which are necessary in every form of finance, were personal ones, such as surety. Credit thus returned to its ancient etymology of believing, trusting and believing above all in someone, therefore in people. In the event of insolvency, the Monti di Pietà sold the pawned objects, and the Grain Banks became ‘insolvent‘: "In fact, since there were no objects to sell in the event of failure to repay the loan, the Monti became ‘insolvent’" (Paola Avellone, All’origine del credito agrario, p. 33). Communities are also made up of these fragilities.

It is a great, long and unknown love story, entirely evangelical and entirely civil, one of the brightest pages in our economic and social history. Let's then add a few more pages.

Eufranio Desideri (1556-1612), who would become San Giuseppe da Leonessa, was one of these tireless Capuchin friars who built dozens of Grain Banks in the villages of the Sibillini and the Monti della Laga, from Amatrice to Norcia, in almost all the villages and towns of those fragile lands. Thus we read in the testimonies of his companions: "When Brother Joseph preached in Bourbon, I was his companion and there was a great famine in that land. Two baskets full of bread were brought by two women. Brother Joseph arrived at the church, blessed the bread and ordered it to be distributed to the poor: there were about 200 of them. We began distributing the bread. In the meantime many more people had come, but in the end there was enough for everyone, indeed there was some left over which was kept in the houses: in ours there were 3 or 4 rows of 12 loaves each left" (http://www.manoscrittisangiuseppe.it/la-vita/). The multiplication of the loaves and fish are a constant in our Christian history, it has been repeated a thousand times in those places where ‘two women’ or ‘a boy’ gave something, and someone else still believed in the miracle of bread for the poor.

Fra Giuseppe was proclaimed a saint by Pope Benedict XIV in 1746, the Pope who took the name of Benedict XIII, that is, Francesco Orsini of Gravina, the ‘farmer pope’, who inspired hundreds of Grain Banks. The year before Benedict XIV had written the Vix Pervenit, the first papal encyclical that legalized interest on loans. In that Encyclical, loans in ‘wheat’ are also mentioned (VP, 3.V), demonstrating how relevant and important the experience of the Grain Banks still was. And, although it is a document that has gone down in history as the legitimization of interest-bearing lending, almost all the Encyclical is instead dedicated to reiterating the illicit nature of usury and interest-bearing loans, which are legitimate only in particular and precise conditions (variants of the ancient ‘emerging damage’ and ’loss of profit’) and "from these derives a completely just and legitimate reason to demand something more than the capital due for the loan" (VP, 3.III). For the rest, he reiterates that "any gain that exceeds capital is illegal and has a usurious nature” (VP, 3.II), which should make those who earn in this way feel "ashamed" - that was a world where the ethics of shame was still effective. A few years later, within the same civil and spiritual tradition, Antonio Genovesi wrote: "The rule: you have the right to give interest to your brothers; The exception: provided they are not poor." (Lessons in Civil Economy, 1767, II, chap. XIII, §20). The poor are not asked for interest: the return of capital is enough. We have forgotten all this in which ancient civil tradition was proficient.

Franciscanism has given us many things, some of them wonderful. Among these the dignity of the poor, who must be esteemed before being helped, because without the esteem of what the poor already are, no not yet good can come about: "I remember that on Sunday, when our convents usually receive a large amount of white bread, Brother Joseph asked me why I gave black bread to the poor who knocked at the door. And with great emphasis he said to me, ‘I want you to give the white bread to the poor.’” The value of white bread for the poor could only be understood by Francis, and his friends of yesterday and today.

[checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [catid] => 1168 [created] => 2023-10-07 04:58:47 [created_by] => 64 [created_by_alias] => Luigino Bruni [state] => 1 [modified] => 2023-10-11 17:07:52 [modified_by] => 64 [modified_by_name] => Antonella Ferrucci [publish_up] => 2023-10-07 04:58:47 [publish_down] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [images] => {"image_intro":"","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {"urla":false,"urlatext":"","targeta":"","urlb":false,"urlbtext":"","targetb":"","urlc":false,"urlctext":"","targetc":""} [attribs] => {"article_layout":"","show_title":"","link_titles":"","show_tags":"","show_intro":"","info_block_position":"","info_block_show_title":"","show_category":"","link_category":"","show_parent_category":"","link_parent_category":"","show_associations":"","show_author":"","link_author":"","show_create_date":"","show_modify_date":"","show_publish_date":"","show_item_navigation":"","show_icons":"","show_print_icon":"","show_email_icon":"","show_vote":"","show_hits":"","show_noauth":"","urls_position":"","alternative_readmore":"","article_page_title":"","show_publishing_options":"","show_article_options":"","show_urls_images_backend":"","show_urls_images_frontend":"","helix_ultimate_image":"images\/2023\/10\/06\/231007_La_terra_del_noi_03_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_image_alt_txt":"","spfeatured_image":"images\/2023\/10\/06\/231007_La_terra_del_noi_03_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_article_format":"standard","helix_ultimate_audio":"","helix_ultimate_gallery":"","helix_ultimate_video":"","video":""} [metadata] => {"robots":"","author":"","rights":"","xreference":""} [metakey] => [metadesc] => [access] => 1 [hits] => 361 [xreference] => [featured] => 1 [language] => en-GB [on_img_default] => 0 [readmore] => 10565 [ordering] => 0 [category_title] => EN - The land of We [category_route] => oikonomia/it-la-terra-del-noi [category_access] => 1 [category_alias] => en-the-land-of-we [published] => 1 [parents_published] => 1 [lft] => 106 [author] => Luigino Bruni [author_email] => ferrucci.anto@gmail.com [parent_title] => Oikonomia [parent_id] => 1025 [parent_route] => oikonomia [parent_alias] => oikonomia [rating] => 0 [rating_count] => 0 [alternative_readmore] => [layout] => [params] => Joomla\Registry\Registry Object ( [data:protected] => stdClass Object ( [article_layout] => _:default [show_title] => 1 [link_titles] => 1 [show_intro] => 1 [info_block_position] => 0 [info_block_show_title] => 1 [show_category] => 1 [link_category] => 1 [show_parent_category] => 1 [link_parent_category] => 1 [show_associations] => 0 [flags] => 1 [show_author] => 0 [link_author] => 0 [show_create_date] => 1 [show_modify_date] => 0 [show_publish_date] => 1 [show_item_navigation] => 1 [show_vote] => 0 [show_readmore] => 0 [show_readmore_title] => 0 [readmore_limit] => 100 [show_tags] => 1 [show_icons] => 1 [show_print_icon] => 1 [show_email_icon] => 1 [show_hits] => 0 [record_hits] => 1 [show_noauth] => 0 [urls_position] => 1 [captcha] => [show_publishing_options] => 1 [show_article_options] => 1 [save_history] => 1 [history_limit] => 10 [show_urls_images_frontend] => 0 [show_urls_images_backend] => 1 [targeta] => 0 [targetb] => 0 [targetc] => 0 [float_intro] => left [float_fulltext] => left [category_layout] => _:blog [show_category_heading_title_text] => 0 [show_category_title] => 0 [show_description] => 0 [show_description_image] => 0 [maxLevel] => 0 [show_empty_categories] => 0 [show_no_articles] => 0 [show_subcat_desc] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles] => 0 [show_cat_tags] => 1 [show_base_description] => 1 [maxLevelcat] => -1 [show_empty_categories_cat] => 0 [show_subcat_desc_cat] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles_cat] => 0 [num_leading_articles] => 0 [num_intro_articles] => 14 [num_columns] => 2 [num_links] => 0 [multi_column_order] => 1 [show_subcategory_content] => -1 [show_pagination_limit] => 1 [filter_field] => hide [show_headings] => 1 [list_show_date] => 0 [date_format] => [list_show_hits] => 1 [list_show_author] => 1 [list_show_votes] => 0 [list_show_ratings] => 0 [orderby_pri] => none [orderby_sec] => rdate [order_date] => published [show_pagination] => 2 [show_pagination_results] => 1 [show_featured] => show [show_feed_link] => 1 [feed_summary] => 0 [feed_show_readmore] => 0 [sef_advanced] => 1 [sef_ids] => 1 [custom_fields_enable] => 1 [show_page_heading] => 0 [layout_type] => blog [menu_text] => 1 [menu_show] => 1 [secure] => 0 [helixultimatemenulayout] => {"width":600,"menualign":"right","megamenu":0,"showtitle":1,"faicon":"","customclass":"","dropdown":"right","badge":"","badge_position":"","badge_bg_color":"","badge_text_color":"","layout":[]} [helixultimate_enable_page_title] => 1 [helixultimate_page_title_alt] => Oikonomia [helixultimate_page_subtitle] => La terra del noi [helixultimate_page_title_heading] => h2 [page_title] => The land of We [page_description] => [page_rights] => [robots] => [access-view] => 1 ) [initialized:protected] => 1 [separator] => . ) [displayDate] => 2023-10-07 04:58:47 [tags] => Joomla\CMS\Helper\TagsHelper Object ( [tagsChanged:protected] => [replaceTags:protected] => [typeAlias] => [itemTags] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [tag_id] => 191 [id] => 191 [parent_id] => 1 [lft] => 379 [rgt] => 380 [level] => 1 [path] => la-terra-del-noi [title] => La terra del 'noi' [alias] => la-terra-del-noi [note] => [description] => [published] => 1 [checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [access] => 1 [params] => {} [metadesc] => [metakey] => [metadata] => {} [created_user_id] => 64 [created_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [created_by_alias] => [modified_user_id] => 0 [modified_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [images] => {} [urls] => {} [hits] => 1594 [language] => * [version] => 1 [publish_up] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [publish_down] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 ) ) ) [slug] => 19590:the-ancient-solidarity-of-during [parent_slug] => 1025:oikonomia [catslug] => 1168:en-the-land-of-we [event] => stdClass Object ( [afterDisplayTitle] => [beforeDisplayContent] => [afterDisplayContent] => ) [text] =>

The land of We/3 - In Latin capitalism the links are in the day to day dynamics of businesses and banks

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on 07/10/2023

The economic institutions of our meridian lands began in a hybrid way and continued so, as long as the way of doing business in the lands under the shadow of the Alps retained the characteristic and unique traits, which today are disappearing into the general melee. Following Augustine and Luther, the Protestant North distinguished the ‘city of God’ from the ‘city of man’ and therefore, the market from the gift, the contract from gratuitousness, solidarity from the enterprise, and profit from non-profit. In the Age of the Counter-Reformation, Latin Humanism reinforced the promiscuity between these worlds and regions. And so it generated parish priests who managed cooperatives and rural banks, entrepreneurial families, friars who embraced extreme poverty while founding banks for the poor.

[jcfields] => Array ( ) [type] => intro [oddeven] => item-even )
The ancient solidarity of «during»

The ancient solidarity of «during»

The land of We/3 - In Latin capitalism the links are in the day to day dynamics of businesses and banks by Luigino Bruni published in Avvenire on 07/10/2023 The economic institutions of our meridian lands began in a hybrid way and continued so, as long as the way of doing business in the lands un...
stdClass Object
(
    [id] => 19584
    [title] => Experts in poverty and economy?
    [alias] => experts-in-poverty-and-economy
    [introtext] => 

The land of We/2 - The void left by the decline of the Grain Banks

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on 30/09/2023

The policy of central governments, first the Bourbons and then the Piedmontese, with the intention of taking control of the agricultural credit institutions from the Church, caused a lot of damage to the South and to small villages

Along with some dark pages, the age of the Counter-Reformation has also seen some luminous ones. Because the ‘land of We’ is the land of community, and community is always an interweaving of light and shadow. One of the luminous pages is that written by the Capuchins, by the Bishops and by many Christians who gave life to the hundreds of Monti di Pietà (Pawn shops) and Monti Frumentari (Grain Banks), and decidedly took the side of the poorest people, especially in Southern Italy. They are pages as luminous as they are unknown and untold by the Social Doctrine of the Church itself, which was formally born in 1891 (Rerum Novarum) when the Monti (Banks) were already in decline and systematically neglected them. And so we do not know that the 114 Monti Frumentari of the Venetian Republic at the end of the 18th century "will be replaced by the rural coffers desired by Leone Wollemborg" (Paola Avallone, Alle origini del credito agrario, 2014, p. 85). However, this transformation of the Monti worked partly in the North, less so in the Centre and essentially failed in Southern Italy, where the void left by the Monti remained empty. Let's see why.

[fulltext] =>

In the history of the Grain Banks there is a specific Southern Question, which begins with the Bourbons and continues with the unitary State. In the Kingdom of Naples, the Grain Banks developed thanks to the significant impulse given by the Church, both institutional (Bishops) and charismatic (Capuchins). A key figure was the Dominican Bishop, Pierfrancesco Orsini (Gravina 1650, Rome 1730), the future Pope Benedict XIII. In Manfredonia (Siponto), where he was Bishop, he established his first Monte Frumentario in 1678 and when he became bishop of Benevento, he established a Monte Frumentario there in 1686 and caused at least one to be established in each village and city leading to the establishment of over a hundred. When he became Pope, he encouraged their establishment everywhere.

It is precisely around the role of the Church in the management of the Monti that the decisive games of their history in Southern Italy were played out. In fact, in 1741, there was a Concordat between the Bourbons and Pope Benedict XIV, which led to the secularization of the Grain Banks, to lessen the interference of the Church in the economic life of the cities. What were the results? A few decades later, Francesco Longano, economist and assistant philosopher to the chair of Antonio Genovesi, wrote very clear and important words in his report following a trip to Molise (and Foggia),: "From time immemorial, for the public relief of the people, a large multitude of Monti di Pietà [Monti frumentari] or Luoghi Pii was found in each Province of the Kingdom. They were so subject to the Bishops and their administration was so exact, that they had prospered immensely. Their income mostly consisted of grain, but also cattle, sheep, and cash rents. An excessive vigilance which in a very short time, together with the annual administrators, reduced, exploited and impoverished them all. Eight or ten privileged people, poor or rich, have formed a kind of monopoly. The rich out of greed, the poor plunder out of need" (Viaggio dell' abate Longano per la Capitanata, 1790, pp. 188-189). The operation of the Bourbons had therefore produced "the irreparable loss of a work of extreme public utility in almost every city, land and village of the Province" (p. 259). And therefore Longano concluded: "We immediately understand the need to re-establish them, by declaring them to be ecclesiastical goods again and subject to the Bishops' Direction" (p. 260). This was a counter-reform which never happened.

As the historian Paola Avallone recalls, "the Grain Banks enjoyed a certain flourishing as long as they were free to operate according to the statutes they had given themselves and as long as they were managed locally by people appointed by the parish priest and held to account for their management to the episcopal authority, as indicated by Pope Benedict XIII after 1724. They prospered as long as they managed to adapt to the needs of the local community “(cit., p. 24). The policy of the central governments, first the Bourbons and then the Piedmontese, with the intention of taking control of the Monti away from the Church, caused a lot of damage, in particular in the South, where the Church had carried out many civil and economic functions for centuries, especially in small villages and among the poorest. They wanted to centralize the management of the Monti, not recognizing their fragile but essential local and community structure, and they caused them to die.

Emblematic in this regard is the failure of the ‘General Grain Bank of the Kingdom of Naples, a central mega-institution (based in Foggia), which should have managed all the Monti scattered throughout the kingdom as peripheral branches, also to overcome the plague of the infamous ‘oral contracts’ in the countryside. Founded in 1781, it never took off. The bureaucracy increased, the distance between those who governed the Monti and the poor farmers increased, and attempts were made to separate the financial component from the charitable one, undermining that dual nature that instead constituted the soul and the secret of their success. It was therefore an anti-subsidiary reform, reinforced by the post-revolutionary French period, by the restoration and finally by the unitary State which tried to transform the Monti into ‘agricultural loan banks’ or ‘savings banks‘, institutions far from the tradition of the villages of the South, from the spirit of those places. I traced two royal decrees, from 31.1.1878 and 14.7.1889, which respectively transformed "the two Monti Frumentari and the pecuniary bank of Roccanova (PZ), and invested their assets in favour of the Loans e Savings Bank", and "the Monti Frumentari of Maltignano (AP) in an Agricultural Loan Bank". The verb used by the bureaucrat of the decree, ‘invert’, resonates today as a prophetic verb: it was precisely a reversal of the meaning of the Monti that was generated by laws that did not understand them. From the decrees we read that in the small Lucanian municipality of Roccanova there were three Monti, and in the village of Maltignano the term ‘Monti’ is used in the plural, testifying how much those blessed institutions were widespread and capillary. In addition, "the maneuver of transforming the Monti Frumentari into Loan Banks, through the conversion of grain into money, particularly favoured the classes not directly interested in the work of the fields... Usury ended up with having the upper hand" (Michele Valente, "Evoluzione socioeconomica dei Sassi di Matera nel XX secolo", 2021, p. 29).

The transformation of the Monti into these new ‘Northern’ coffers therefore involved a financialisation of the Monti Frumentari which, unlike the Monti Pecuniari that often accompanied them, used grain as currency. The great innovation of those different banks was the use of grain as currency; the novelty was precisely the reduction of an intermediary step, a crucial element in a world with very little money and therefore held by usurers. The new laws forced the Monti to abandon grain-currency and transform themselves into ordinary financial institutions. And there they died. Moreover, the laws of the State did not understand the hybrid nature of these institutions, credit and charity, contract and gift and fought it, without understanding that opposing this hybrid nature meant denying the history of the Monti, who lived as long as and as long as they were spurious, mixed and contaminated. They wanted to separate what was united by nature and vocation, and they made them die. Of course, we all know that behind a mass extinction of thousands of Monti there are many reasons inscribed in the evolution of Italian and European society over the centuries, but the anti-subsidiarity reforms, the anti-clerical ideological attitude, the cultural distance between the new rulers and the farmers, were decisive elements for this economic and social massacre: who knows what southern finance, economy and society could have been if the Monti had been understood and protected? Giustino Fortunato, a southern politician and intellectual, was very opposed to the reform of the Monti and in general to the agrarian and economic policy of the unitary State in the South. In a letter to Pasquale Villari dated 18.1.1878, he wrote: "A reform made in depth on preconceived ideas, on a priori... The confusion is great. First example: the transformation of the Monti Frumentari into Agricultural Loan Funds" (Carteggio (1865-1911), pp. 11-12). The reform was, for Fortunato, a true "gravestone" for the Monti and for the “cafoni” (ignorant peasants).

And here we must return to the vocation and nature of the ‘Catholic’ and meridian economy. The pastoral action of the Counter-Reformation had strengthened and developed the widespread presence of the Church in the countryside, which, especially in the South, was in a condition of serious degradation, including economic deterioration. The constant presence of friars, nuns and priests in every village, in the parishes, in the many rural convents, had led the Church to understand the real needs of real people, and so it became expert in concrete poverty and the economy. And the Monti Frumentari were born: "As long as those institutions were administered by ecclesiastics, the goods kept in them were considered sacrosanct and therefore untouchable. From the moment they were secularized, they were plundered without any restraint (Paola Avallone, cit., p. 27).

What still remains in Italy and in southern Europe of the social and civil tradition, of the institutions of financial solidarity, today risks suffering the same fate as the Monti Frumentari, where the rulers are no longer the Bourbons and the Piedmontese but the algorithms of Basel and of the national and international financial institutions, which separate credit from communities, which distance choices from regions, which no longer listen to the real needs of concrete people and when they try to listen to them they do not understand them because they speak too different languages, and without translators.

I end by giving the floor to Ignazio Silone, who has redeemed the honour of the word ‘cafoni’, a word too full of injustice, pain and hope, which still awaits the day when pain will no longer be a shame: "I well know that the term of ‘cafone’, in the current language of my country, is a term of offence and mockery: but I use it in this book in the certainty that when in my country pain will no longer be a shame, it will become a name of respect, and perhaps even of honour" (Fontamara, Introduction).

[checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [catid] => 1168 [created] => 2023-09-30 07:10:34 [created_by] => 64 [created_by_alias] => Luigino Bruni [state] => 1 [modified] => 2023-10-06 16:12:45 [modified_by] => 64 [modified_by_name] => Antonella Ferrucci [publish_up] => 2023-09-30 07:22:31 [publish_down] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [images] => {"image_intro":"","image_sp_full":"images\/2023\/09\/30\/230930_La_terra_del_noi_02_ant.jpg","image_sp_thumb":"images\/2023\/09\/30\/230930_La_terra_del_noi_02_ant_thumbnail.jpg","image_sp_medium":"images\/2023\/09\/30\/230930_La_terra_del_noi_02_ant_medium.jpg","image_sp_large":"images\/2023\/09\/30\/230930_La_terra_del_noi_02_ant_large.jpg","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {"urla":false,"urlatext":"","targeta":"","urlb":false,"urlbtext":"","targetb":"","urlc":false,"urlctext":"","targetc":""} [attribs] => {"article_layout":"","show_title":"","link_titles":"","show_tags":"","show_intro":"","info_block_position":"","info_block_show_title":"","show_category":"","link_category":"","show_parent_category":"","link_parent_category":"","show_associations":"","show_author":"","link_author":"","show_create_date":"","show_modify_date":"","show_publish_date":"","show_item_navigation":"","show_icons":"","show_print_icon":"","show_email_icon":"","show_vote":"","show_hits":"","show_noauth":"","urls_position":"","alternative_readmore":"","article_page_title":"","show_publishing_options":"","show_article_options":"","show_urls_images_backend":"","show_urls_images_frontend":"","spfeatured_image":"images\/2023\/09\/30\/230930_La_terra_del_noi_02_ant.jpg","spfeatured_image_alt":"","post_format":"standard","gallery":"","audio":"","video":"","helix_ultimate_video":"","helix_ultimate_article_format":"standard","helix_ultimate_image":"images\/2023\/09\/30\/230930_La_terra_del_noi_02_ant.jpg","link_title":"","link_url":"","quote_text":"","quote_author":"","post_status":""} [metadata] => {"robots":"","author":"","rights":"","xreference":""} [metakey] => [metadesc] => [access] => 1 [hits] => 333 [xreference] => [featured] => 1 [language] => en-GB [on_img_default] => 0 [readmore] => 9725 [ordering] => 0 [category_title] => EN - The land of We [category_route] => oikonomia/it-la-terra-del-noi [category_access] => 1 [category_alias] => en-the-land-of-we [published] => 1 [parents_published] => 1 [lft] => 106 [author] => Luigino Bruni [author_email] => ferrucci.anto@gmail.com [parent_title] => Oikonomia [parent_id] => 1025 [parent_route] => oikonomia [parent_alias] => oikonomia [rating] => 0 [rating_count] => 0 [alternative_readmore] => [layout] => [params] => Joomla\Registry\Registry Object ( [data:protected] => stdClass Object ( [article_layout] => _:default [show_title] => 1 [link_titles] => 1 [show_intro] => 1 [info_block_position] => 0 [info_block_show_title] => 1 [show_category] => 1 [link_category] => 1 [show_parent_category] => 1 [link_parent_category] => 1 [show_associations] => 0 [flags] => 1 [show_author] => 0 [link_author] => 0 [show_create_date] => 1 [show_modify_date] => 0 [show_publish_date] => 1 [show_item_navigation] => 1 [show_vote] => 0 [show_readmore] => 0 [show_readmore_title] => 0 [readmore_limit] => 100 [show_tags] => 1 [show_icons] => 1 [show_print_icon] => 1 [show_email_icon] => 1 [show_hits] => 0 [record_hits] => 1 [show_noauth] => 0 [urls_position] => 1 [captcha] => [show_publishing_options] => 1 [show_article_options] => 1 [save_history] => 1 [history_limit] => 10 [show_urls_images_frontend] => 0 [show_urls_images_backend] => 1 [targeta] => 0 [targetb] => 0 [targetc] => 0 [float_intro] => left [float_fulltext] => left [category_layout] => _:blog [show_category_heading_title_text] => 0 [show_category_title] => 0 [show_description] => 0 [show_description_image] => 0 [maxLevel] => 0 [show_empty_categories] => 0 [show_no_articles] => 0 [show_subcat_desc] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles] => 0 [show_cat_tags] => 1 [show_base_description] => 1 [maxLevelcat] => -1 [show_empty_categories_cat] => 0 [show_subcat_desc_cat] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles_cat] => 0 [num_leading_articles] => 0 [num_intro_articles] => 14 [num_columns] => 2 [num_links] => 0 [multi_column_order] => 1 [show_subcategory_content] => -1 [show_pagination_limit] => 1 [filter_field] => hide [show_headings] => 1 [list_show_date] => 0 [date_format] => [list_show_hits] => 1 [list_show_author] => 1 [list_show_votes] => 0 [list_show_ratings] => 0 [orderby_pri] => none [orderby_sec] => rdate [order_date] => published [show_pagination] => 2 [show_pagination_results] => 1 [show_featured] => show [show_feed_link] => 1 [feed_summary] => 0 [feed_show_readmore] => 0 [sef_advanced] => 1 [sef_ids] => 1 [custom_fields_enable] => 1 [show_page_heading] => 0 [layout_type] => blog [menu_text] => 1 [menu_show] => 1 [secure] => 0 [helixultimatemenulayout] => {"width":600,"menualign":"right","megamenu":0,"showtitle":1,"faicon":"","customclass":"","dropdown":"right","badge":"","badge_position":"","badge_bg_color":"","badge_text_color":"","layout":[]} [helixultimate_enable_page_title] => 1 [helixultimate_page_title_alt] => Oikonomia [helixultimate_page_subtitle] => La terra del noi [helixultimate_page_title_heading] => h2 [page_title] => The land of We [page_description] => [page_rights] => [robots] => [access-view] => 1 ) [initialized:protected] => 1 [separator] => . ) [displayDate] => 2023-09-30 07:10:34 [tags] => Joomla\CMS\Helper\TagsHelper Object ( [tagsChanged:protected] => [replaceTags:protected] => [typeAlias] => [itemTags] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [tag_id] => 191 [id] => 191 [parent_id] => 1 [lft] => 379 [rgt] => 380 [level] => 1 [path] => la-terra-del-noi [title] => La terra del 'noi' [alias] => la-terra-del-noi [note] => [description] => [published] => 1 [checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [access] => 1 [params] => {} [metadesc] => [metakey] => [metadata] => {} [created_user_id] => 64 [created_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [created_by_alias] => [modified_user_id] => 0 [modified_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [images] => {} [urls] => {} [hits] => 1594 [language] => * [version] => 1 [publish_up] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [publish_down] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 ) ) ) [slug] => 19584:experts-in-poverty-and-economy [parent_slug] => 1025:oikonomia [catslug] => 1168:en-the-land-of-we [event] => stdClass Object ( [afterDisplayTitle] => [beforeDisplayContent] => [afterDisplayContent] => ) [text] =>

The land of We/2 - The void left by the decline of the Grain Banks

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on 30/09/2023

The policy of central governments, first the Bourbons and then the Piedmontese, with the intention of taking control of the agricultural credit institutions from the Church, caused a lot of damage to the South and to small villages

Along with some dark pages, the age of the Counter-Reformation has also seen some luminous ones. Because the ‘land of We’ is the land of community, and community is always an interweaving of light and shadow. One of the luminous pages is that written by the Capuchins, by the Bishops and by many Christians who gave life to the hundreds of Monti di Pietà (Pawn shops) and Monti Frumentari (Grain Banks), and decidedly took the side of the poorest people, especially in Southern Italy. They are pages as luminous as they are unknown and untold by the Social Doctrine of the Church itself, which was formally born in 1891 (Rerum Novarum) when the Monti (Banks) were already in decline and systematically neglected them. And so we do not know that the 114 Monti Frumentari of the Venetian Republic at the end of the 18th century "will be replaced by the rural coffers desired by Leone Wollemborg" (Paola Avallone, Alle origini del credito agrario, 2014, p. 85). However, this transformation of the Monti worked partly in the North, less so in the Centre and essentially failed in Southern Italy, where the void left by the Monti remained empty. Let's see why.

[jcfields] => Array ( ) [type] => intro [oddeven] => item-odd )
Experts in poverty and economy?

Experts in poverty and economy?

The land of We/2 - The void left by the decline of the Grain Banks by Luigino Bruni published in Avvenire on 30/09/2023 The policy of central governments, first the Bourbons and then the Piedmontese, with the intention of taking control of the agricultural credit institutions from the Church, caused...
stdClass Object
(
    [id] => 19579
    [title] => That other economy of grain solidarity
    [alias] => that-other-economy-of-grain-solidarity
    [introtext] => 

The land of We/1 - The origin and meaning of the “Monti frumentari (Grain Banks)”

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on 23/09/2023

The Franciscans, and then the Church and society, understood that when dealing with poverty and the scarcity of money, there is a simple solution which is often forgotten: to reduce the use of money. The modern Catholic and meridian world has generated its own idea of economy, different in many aspects from that of Nordic and Protestant capitalism. The reaction of the Church of Rome to the Lutheran schism strengthened and amplified some dimensions of the market and finance already present in the Middle Ages and created new ones. In the series "The land of We", Luigino Bruni continues his reflection on the origins and roots of capitalism and society in the age of the Counter-Reformation.

[fulltext] =>

The fight against usury is one of the constant features in the history of the pre-modern Church. Bishops and monks, who were close to the people, understood that the first victims of usury were above all the poorest. In over a thousand years, between the Council of Elvira (about 305) and that of Vienna (1311), there were about "seventy councils in every district" which used very strong words against usury (P.G. Gaggia, Le usure, p. 3). And while Popes and Bishops issued decrees and documents against usury, Bishops and charisms set up anti-usury financial institutions, so that the proclamation of documents did not remain abstract. In the Church, reality has always been superior to the idea, ever since the logos decided to become a child. This tenacious fight against usury and these anti-Usury institutions is part of the very roots of Europe. They include the Franciscan Monti di Pietà (pawn shops) which were very important, and which for some decades now have finally become the focus of renewed interest. Less studied are the Monti Frumentari (Grain Banks), also of Franciscan inspiration. But how much should we thank Francis and his followers? Hybrid institutions, just as "the Catholic economy", was (and is), the communitarian and Latin economy, that "land of We" that assimilated its mix, its ambivalence, its flesh and its blood from the community.

Like the Monti di Pietà, the Monti Frumentari were partly bank, partly assistance, partly loan, partly gift, partly market, partly solidarity, gratuity and interest, individual and community, honesty and corruption, trust and surety, city and church. The Grain Banks were a fundamental institution for the Italian rural economy (and beyond), especially that of the Centre-South, and they remained so for over four centuries (!). And like the Monti di Pietà, the Monti Frumentari also came into being in imitation of pre-existing institutions. For the Montes pietatis, the Franciscans of the Observance were inspired by the Roman deposita pietatis (pietas was also a great Roman word) and also the ecclesiastics of the first centuries, institutions that were "piety’s deposit fund (…) to support (…) poor people (...) such too, as have suffered shipwreck" (Tertullian, Apol. 39.6). But certainly the Franciscans imitated above all the Jewish "pawnshops", bringing innovations: low interest, the type of pawn, the timing of repayments... The Grain Banks (or granary, wheat, nummari, abundance, relief, flour, chestnuts banks ...) were born as a development of public grain and seed deposits, managed in the Middle Ages by municipalities or monasteries to cope with bad harvests and famines. In Massa Marittima the "Palace of Abundance" dates back to 1265. The name of the municipality of Montegranaro refers to medieval (perhaps Roman) public deposits of wheat, barley and cereals. The first icons of banks were mountains, think of the Chigi bankers, to tell us that the mountain, the deposit, and piling-up, were the first form of modern finance.

Wheat was the first name of the Mediterranean economy (F. Braudel). It was central for the life of mostly rural populations, in trade, for the wealth and poverty of cities, fiefdoms, countryside; and it took a war in Europe to remind us that we still live and die for wheat. The Bible can also be told as a story of grain and bread: from manna to the Eucharist. The Grain Banks were the realization of Joseph's wisdom, of his ability to interpret dreams and thus to cope with the years of "lean cows" by accumulating grain deposits during the "fat cows". This is one of the most sad and beautiful stories about betrayed and cared for brotherhood and it is accompanied by the smell of wheat, which is the same smell as in the story of Ruth, the ancestor of Jesus. Tithing and gleaning were institutions of solidarity with nature, typical of a non-monetary and predominantly agricultural world. The Temple of Jerusalem itself, and before it the sanctuaries, also carried out the function of collecting, preserving and redistributing seeds.

The Franciscans turned the old wheat banks into something new and created the Monti Frumentari (Grain Banks). When they visited the people of the rural villages, they listened to their aspirations and realized that the small and medium peasant (sharecropper or emphyteuta) was often in great difficulty: all it took was a poor year, an accident, a disease or a flood and the grain destined for seed for the next year was consumed so as not to die of hunger and so for the new sowing they had to go into debt, usually with usurers who drove them into poverty. The Grain Banks were born in the same places as the Monti di Pietà, but with distinct statutes and officials. They were not purely philanthropic entities: a non-monetary "interest" was paid on the grain. In general, the bushel was taken "by the level" and returned "by the heap"; a small interest therefore, not too different from the monetary rate of the Monti di Pietà (around 5%) – the Franciscans did not think that gratuity coincided with free. The work of Bernardino da Feltre was fundamental because in 1515 a papal bull (Inter multiplices, Leo X) recognized the lawfulness of the interest of the Monti di Pietà. The first Franciscan Grain Banks came into being in the 1480s, between Umbria and Abruzzo. The names of these first Monti, "Monte della Pietà del grano della Vergine Maria" of Rieti, or "Monte della Pietà del grano" of Sulmona, reveal an initial budding of the Grain Banks from the Monti di Pietà. The Franciscans understood that in the rural context monetary lending did not work, and they imagined non-monetary banks. Wheat was in fact decisive in the life and death of people and in a world with very little currency in circulation, those who held the money had too great a power not to abuse it through usury. Later, the Monti Pecuniari (which always lent wheat and agricultural products but for payment in cash) were added to the Grain Banks but the use of wheat as currency (the "grain") was the great innovation of the Monti and the reason for their longevity.

To date, it seems that the oldest Monte is that of Norcia (1487), founded by Fr. Andrea da Faenza (the true wheat missionary). However, it is interesting that, in 1771, the historian A.L. Antinori claimed the primacy of Leonessa: "In 1446, under the care of Antonio di Colandrea, the Monti di Pietà in Lagonessa built a strong room for deposits and pawns near the square" (cf. Giuseppe Chiaretti, Leonessa Arte, History, Tourism, 1995). The stone, an entrance portal, is preserved today in the local convent of St. Frances. The payment of interest to the Grain Bank was easier for the Church to accept, because the ethical issue of usury depended on the ancient thesis of the sterility of money, a sterility that does not exist in wheat: here the interest (or increase) was considered a sharing of the natural profit resulting from the generosity of the land (sow 1 and reap 10).

The historian, Palmerino Savoia, tells us about Bishop Orsini’s incessant work to establish Grain Banks at the end of the seventeenth century. Orsini was the future Pope Benedict XIII, known as "God's farmer" (to whom we will return). Savoia described the operation of the Grain Bank of Benevento in this way: "The Monte was administered by two governors and two custodians who held office for one year and were appointed by the Archbishop. The loan of the grain was made four times a year: in October to help with sowing, in December to help the needy during the Christmas holidays, in March for the Easter holidays and in May to the glory of St. Philip Neri» (Una grande istituzione sociale: I monti frumentari, 1973, Acerra). This is a detail that indicates what the holidays were for our people: in the midst of misery, and precisely because they were poor and exposed to the radical fragility of life, life was celebrated on feast days, we celebrated together to continue to hope and to defeat death. And the Church, here truly a teacher of humanity, understood and approved the loans of grain for special meals and desserts, which interrupted hunger and famine and said to the poor: "you are not always and forever poor". Today we have forgotten what holidays are because we have forgotten the art of the little, the great art of the poor. And so, in the abundance of "grain", we die from festive famines. 

Some statistics express the expansion of the Monti Frumentari were: in 1861 in Southern Italy there were 1,054 Grain Banks, double those in the North, of which about 300 in Sardinia alone; in central Italy, particularly in Umbria and the Marche, there were 402 Grain Banks (P. Avallone, "Il credito", in Il mezzogiorno prima dell 'unità, by N. Ostuni and P. Malanima, 2013, p. 268). Why did they become extinct? In 1717, in the diocese of Benevento, of the then Bishop Orsini, there were "157 Grain Banks", not branches but independent entities (P. Calderoni Martini, Fra Francesco Maria Orsini and the agrarian credit in the XVII, Naples, 1933). In the eighteenth century, among the protagonists of the debates on the Grain Banks were the best "civil" economists, from Giuseppe Palmieri to Francesco Longano, the student of Genovesi who from 1760 to 1769 supported and then replaced his sick master in the lessons of Civil Economics in Naples. The Monti were real economic, financial and ethical institutions, not ‘pious works’.

The Franciscans, and then bishops and citizens understood that when dealing with poverty and the scarcity of money, there is a simple solution which is often forgotten: to reduce the use of money. They understood that an economy could be created without money: if it was grain that was necessary and scarce, then it was grain itself that could become the currency, without the need for another intermediary. They skipped a step, shortened the economic supply chain and lengthened the life supply chain. One step less became one step more. They innovated by removing and reducing a degree of intermediation. Today there are billions of people excluded from money, who need new local and global, non-usurious financial institutions. Will we be able today to imitate the ethical and civil creativity of yesterday's Franciscans?

[checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [catid] => 1168 [created] => 2023-09-23 11:05:51 [created_by] => 64 [created_by_alias] => Luigino Bruni [state] => 1 [modified] => 2023-09-27 08:21:55 [modified_by] => 64 [modified_by_name] => Antonella Ferrucci [publish_up] => 2023-09-23 11:16:37 [publish_down] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [images] => {"image_intro":"","image_sp_full":"images\/2023\/09\/23\/230923_La_terra_del_noi_01_ant.jpg","image_sp_thumb":"images\/2023\/09\/23\/230923_La_terra_del_noi_01_ant_thumbnail.jpg","image_sp_medium":"images\/2023\/09\/23\/230923_La_terra_del_noi_01_ant_medium.jpg","image_sp_large":"images\/2023\/09\/23\/230923_La_terra_del_noi_01_ant_large.jpg","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {"urla":false,"urlatext":"","targeta":"","urlb":false,"urlbtext":"","targetb":"","urlc":false,"urlctext":"","targetc":""} [attribs] => {"article_layout":"","show_title":"","link_titles":"","show_tags":"","show_intro":"","info_block_position":"","info_block_show_title":"","show_category":"","link_category":"","show_parent_category":"","link_parent_category":"","show_associations":"","show_author":"","link_author":"","show_create_date":"","show_modify_date":"","show_publish_date":"","show_item_navigation":"","show_icons":"","show_print_icon":"","show_email_icon":"","show_vote":"","show_hits":"","show_noauth":"","urls_position":"","alternative_readmore":"","article_page_title":"","show_publishing_options":"","show_article_options":"","show_urls_images_backend":"","show_urls_images_frontend":"","spfeatured_image":"images\/2023\/09\/23\/230923_La_terra_del_noi_01_ant.jpg","spfeatured_image_alt":"","post_format":"standard","gallery":"","audio":"","video":"","helix_ultimate_video":"","helix_ultimate_article_format":"standard","helix_ultimate_image":"images\/2023\/09\/23\/230923_La_terra_del_noi_01_ant.jpg","link_title":"","link_url":"","quote_text":"","quote_author":"","post_status":""} [metadata] => {"robots":"","author":"","rights":"","xreference":""} [metakey] => [metadesc] => [access] => 1 [hits] => 373 [xreference] => [featured] => 1 [language] => en-GB [on_img_default] => 0 [readmore] => 10333 [ordering] => 0 [category_title] => EN - The land of We [category_route] => oikonomia/it-la-terra-del-noi [category_access] => 1 [category_alias] => en-the-land-of-we [published] => 1 [parents_published] => 1 [lft] => 106 [author] => Luigino Bruni [author_email] => ferrucci.anto@gmail.com [parent_title] => Oikonomia [parent_id] => 1025 [parent_route] => oikonomia [parent_alias] => oikonomia [rating] => 0 [rating_count] => 0 [alternative_readmore] => [layout] => [params] => Joomla\Registry\Registry Object ( [data:protected] => stdClass Object ( [article_layout] => _:default [show_title] => 1 [link_titles] => 1 [show_intro] => 1 [info_block_position] => 0 [info_block_show_title] => 1 [show_category] => 1 [link_category] => 1 [show_parent_category] => 1 [link_parent_category] => 1 [show_associations] => 0 [flags] => 1 [show_author] => 0 [link_author] => 0 [show_create_date] => 1 [show_modify_date] => 0 [show_publish_date] => 1 [show_item_navigation] => 1 [show_vote] => 0 [show_readmore] => 0 [show_readmore_title] => 0 [readmore_limit] => 100 [show_tags] => 1 [show_icons] => 1 [show_print_icon] => 1 [show_email_icon] => 1 [show_hits] => 0 [record_hits] => 1 [show_noauth] => 0 [urls_position] => 1 [captcha] => [show_publishing_options] => 1 [show_article_options] => 1 [save_history] => 1 [history_limit] => 10 [show_urls_images_frontend] => 0 [show_urls_images_backend] => 1 [targeta] => 0 [targetb] => 0 [targetc] => 0 [float_intro] => left [float_fulltext] => left [category_layout] => _:blog [show_category_heading_title_text] => 0 [show_category_title] => 0 [show_description] => 0 [show_description_image] => 0 [maxLevel] => 0 [show_empty_categories] => 0 [show_no_articles] => 0 [show_subcat_desc] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles] => 0 [show_cat_tags] => 1 [show_base_description] => 1 [maxLevelcat] => -1 [show_empty_categories_cat] => 0 [show_subcat_desc_cat] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles_cat] => 0 [num_leading_articles] => 0 [num_intro_articles] => 14 [num_columns] => 2 [num_links] => 0 [multi_column_order] => 1 [show_subcategory_content] => -1 [show_pagination_limit] => 1 [filter_field] => hide [show_headings] => 1 [list_show_date] => 0 [date_format] => [list_show_hits] => 1 [list_show_author] => 1 [list_show_votes] => 0 [list_show_ratings] => 0 [orderby_pri] => none [orderby_sec] => rdate [order_date] => published [show_pagination] => 2 [show_pagination_results] => 1 [show_featured] => show [show_feed_link] => 1 [feed_summary] => 0 [feed_show_readmore] => 0 [sef_advanced] => 1 [sef_ids] => 1 [custom_fields_enable] => 1 [show_page_heading] => 0 [layout_type] => blog [menu_text] => 1 [menu_show] => 1 [secure] => 0 [helixultimatemenulayout] => {"width":600,"menualign":"right","megamenu":0,"showtitle":1,"faicon":"","customclass":"","dropdown":"right","badge":"","badge_position":"","badge_bg_color":"","badge_text_color":"","layout":[]} [helixultimate_enable_page_title] => 1 [helixultimate_page_title_alt] => Oikonomia [helixultimate_page_subtitle] => La terra del noi [helixultimate_page_title_heading] => h2 [page_title] => The land of We [page_description] => [page_rights] => [robots] => [access-view] => 1 ) [initialized:protected] => 1 [separator] => . ) [displayDate] => 2023-09-23 11:05:51 [tags] => Joomla\CMS\Helper\TagsHelper Object ( [tagsChanged:protected] => [replaceTags:protected] => [typeAlias] => [itemTags] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [tag_id] => 191 [id] => 191 [parent_id] => 1 [lft] => 379 [rgt] => 380 [level] => 1 [path] => la-terra-del-noi [title] => La terra del 'noi' [alias] => la-terra-del-noi [note] => [description] => [published] => 1 [checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [access] => 1 [params] => {} [metadesc] => [metakey] => [metadata] => {} [created_user_id] => 64 [created_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [created_by_alias] => [modified_user_id] => 0 [modified_time] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [images] => {} [urls] => {} [hits] => 1594 [language] => * [version] => 1 [publish_up] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 [publish_down] => 2023-09-23 08:53:08 ) ) ) [slug] => 19579:that-other-economy-of-grain-solidarity [parent_slug] => 1025:oikonomia [catslug] => 1168:en-the-land-of-we [event] => stdClass Object ( [afterDisplayTitle] => [beforeDisplayContent] => [afterDisplayContent] => ) [text] =>

The land of We/1 - The origin and meaning of the “Monti frumentari (Grain Banks)”

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on 23/09/2023

The Franciscans, and then the Church and society, understood that when dealing with poverty and the scarcity of money, there is a simple solution which is often forgotten: to reduce the use of money. The modern Catholic and meridian world has generated its own idea of economy, different in many aspects from that of Nordic and Protestant capitalism. The reaction of the Church of Rome to the Lutheran schism strengthened and amplified some dimensions of the market and finance already present in the Middle Ages and created new ones. In the series "The land of We", Luigino Bruni continues his reflection on the origins and roots of capitalism and society in the age of the Counter-Reformation.

[jcfields] => Array ( ) [type] => intro [oddeven] => item-even )
That other economy of grain solidarity

That other economy of grain solidarity

The land of We/1 - The origin and meaning of the “Monti frumentari (Grain Banks)” by Luigino Bruni published in Avvenire on 23/09/2023 The Franciscans, and then the Church and society, understood that when dealing with poverty and the scarcity of money, there is a simple solution which is often forg...